English Paper 2 Predictions & Thoughts (2 Viewers)

[uniqueusername1]

After finishing English for the rest of high school..View attachment 33539

that happiness will kick in once all exams are over. Rn don't even have time to process that fact that it's over.

 

[DarkOperator618]

that happiness will kick in once all exams are over. Rn don't even have time to process that fact that it's over.

me on the 26th of November at 12.30

 

[uniqueusername1]

me on the 26th of November at 12.30

oi same lad. Physics. My fav subject to end the year.

 

[dannyo1]

lmao I just took the stimulus as a metaphor for writing lol and did my usual creative/discursive on the writing process. Markers are filled with ecstasy if they see the words "intertextuality" or "metafiction"

 

[DarkOperator618]

oi same lad. Physics. My fav subject to end the year.

pr fucking each

 

[specificagent1]

anyone have the stimlus? for mod c?

 

[YourLocalDumbAss]

oi same lad. Physics. My fav subject to end the year.

‘lad’ nice terminology

 

[uniqueusername1]

‘lad’ nice terminology

learnt it from you sir

 

[YourLocalDumbAss]

learnt it from you sir

I’m not the gang leader, im the person who would sustain any punch

 

[uniqueusername1]

I’m not the gang leader, im the person who would sustain any punch

na you are cheeky boy. I heard they're building a statue of you in Town Hall thats how influential you are.

 

[liv888]

I didn’t get to finish my reflection

same omg my handwriting is completely out the window too

 

[Greninja340]

for the extract question in mod a, i didnt use any quotes from the extract, the only thing i did was analyse the extracts meaning in the introduction and link all my body paragraphs to the central idea of the extracts that i had written in the intro, how screwed am I?

 

[tito981]

We didn’t have to use those extracts exclusively for mod a right?

you can refer to them only, but i think it is stronger to use the extract once or twice to reinforce your point

 

[hiiitsme]

you can refer to them only, but i think it is stronger to use the extract once or twice to reinforce your point

beautiful

 

[mikrokosmos]

I wrote a discursive on how writing provides us escapism from challenge and the world around us. However, it has become more of a burden in recent times due to the growing importance on the aesthetics of language rather than the meaning of language itself.

Band 4 stuff i know. It is what it is.

thats amazing!! very much 4unit level

 

[tito981]

for the extract question in mod a, i didnt use any quotes from the extract, the only thing i did was analyse the extracts meaning in the introduction and link all my body paragraphs to the central idea of the extracts that i had written in the intro, how screwed am I?

it shouldnt matter too much as the main part of the question wasnt to refer to the extract (it was like that for my text).

 

[DarkOperator618]

I wrote a discursive on how writing provides us escapism from challenge and the world around us. However, it has become more of a burden in recent times due to the growing importance on the aesthetics of language rather than the meaning of language itself.

Band 4 stuff i know. It is what it is.

fucken nerd

 

[hiiitsme]

I wrote a discursive on how writing provides us escapism from challenge and the world around us. However, it has become more of a burden in recent times due to the growing importance on the aesthetics of language rather than the meaning of language itself.

Band 4 stuff i know. It is what it is.

I kinda did the same thing but blamed the hsc for it so hope the HSC markers arent too sensitive

 

[hatterene]

how did us advanced kids go?

i knew it was gonna turn out like this tbh. i predicted the valediction or sunne rising was gonna be an extract that we had to analyse but i didn't think that they made us analyse two extracts!!! i found that question to be super tough because i had to analyse on the spot but i managed to pull it off in 35 minutes anyway. also i'm still confused on how there was *no* question for mod a? they just told us to analyse the extract and refer to it in our essay?!

for module b, i predicted a general question on form but it was about purpose instead. the question was generic asf which was good but that means the standard is set higher and i was being very conservative on time here so i didn't write too much. i ended up memorising everything which is good.

mod c kinda threw me off because i predicted a discursive/something based off of a character in mod a or b but it ended up being a visual stimulus. the stimulus was broad and it fit my story perfectly tbh. i just wish i had more time for the reflection and added in like 2 more analytical statements but it's okay. still kinda sour ugh.

 

[Greninja340]

how did us advanced kids go?

i knew it was gonna turn out like this tbh. i predicted the valediction or sunne rising was gonna be an extract that we had to analyse but i didn't think that they made us analyse two extracts!!! i found that question to be super tough because i had to analyse on the spot but i managed to pull it off in 35 minutes anyway. also i'm still confused on how there was *no* question for mod a? they just told us to analyse the extract and refer to it in our essay?!

for module b, i predicted a general question on form but it was about purpose instead. the question was generic asf which was good but that means the standard is set higher and i was being very conservative on time here so i didn't write too much. i ended up memorising everything which is good.

mod c kinda threw me off because i predicted a discursive/something based off of a character in mod a or b but it ended up being a visual stimulus. the stimulus was broad and it fit my story perfectly tbh. i just wish i had more time for the reflection and added in like 2 more analytical statements but it's okay. still kinda sour ugh.

Mod A: I think i did alright with the only thing being i didnt add any quotes from the extract, but i linked my essay to it a lot
Mod B: I think i did pretty well in this the only thing i was iffy on was the "unanswerable" questions, cause in the text i did the composer provides an answer to all the questions and i didn't really address this component of the question so i think i might lose some marks for that, otherwise i think my analysis was pretty good and fit the rest of the question well
Mod C: idk i kinda bombed it i think, in total i think i wrote 5.5 pages, my story worked with the stimulus but i still fell really iffy about it and my reflection was not amazing either, I had to Bs so hard on this big in order to fit my memorised techniques for the figurative language part of the question and the analysis on my prescribed text was pretty shallow as well.
All in all, im praying everything else carries my mod c