DarkOperator618
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2020
- Messages
- 1,349
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2021
bro that paper was hard af
what about the prominent individuals, i thought source e was kinda shit
yeh i did goring, hitler, goebells and himmler
dw sir darkoperator IVbro that paper was hard af
i linked geography to territory coz it emphasised the role of treaties ‘ending world war 1’ (i think lol)territory is geography tho?
for that one i used versailles as an example cus that's the only one i knew lmaoi linked geography to territory coz it emphasised the role of treaties ‘ending world war 1’ (i think lol)
so then i could link back to TOV and saint germaine
With that last q in civil rights, I talked about their role in voicing change, as well as the legislation, but said it was ultimately the grassroots (e.g. Bus Boycott) that brought success.russia was bullshit but i did power struggle question - did not really know what they meant by leading Bolshevik figures but don't think I did too bad on that
arab-israeli questions would have been good if i studdieed more
power and authority was ez
civil rights was okay until last question, nessa fuckeed us with that
yeah i didn’t go to in depth coz it said outlinefor that one i used versailles as an example cus that's the only one i knew lmao
related germany's issues with borders to its want for revenge in ww2
yea i only remembered tovyeah i didn’t go to in depth coz it said outline
but at the start i mentioned how the treaties were made for the benefit of the superpowers.
tov
- lost polish corridor
lost alsace and lorraine
germaine
- divided austria and hungary
trianon
idk if it’s right but i said bulgaria had to give up a bunch of land and made up a stat
seeee that’s what im confused aboutWith that last q in civil rights, I talked about their role in voicing change, as well as the legislation, but said it was ultimately the grassroots (e.g. Bus Boycott) that brought success.
last qbfor civil rights not too bad if u did CSSA trials paper, but i didnt but i just couldnt be bothered so many regretsrussia was bullshit but i did power struggle question - did not really know what they meant by leading Bolshevik figures but don't think I did too bad on that
arab-israeli questions would have been good if i studdieed more
power and authority was ez
civil rights was okay until last question, nessa fuckeed us with that
Yeah.seeee that’s what im confused about
i wrote a paragraph evaluating each presidents role… and my teacher said that’s right….
but now im like, because it said ‘to what extent’ would you talk about other stuff (i did mention how activist groups were more effective but looked at presidents in detail)
They'll have marking guidelines and if you argue it well, then they will award you as necessary.also, do you lot think that modern is subjective like english? cus i keep hearing ppl talk about what they did and its vastly different to mine so idk
oh FUCK yeaThey'll have marking guidelines and if you argue it well, then they will award you as necessary.
So i guess it's like English, but not really.
I mean it said role of prominent individuals.oh FUCK yea
far out i didn't put a personality for the second one and said 'the collective work of the nazi officials' and leeched off the source and analysed the everlasting shit out of it
i mean i said what the nazis did in upholding the ideologyI mean it said role of prominent individuals.
Obviously you need to talk about *individuals*, but if you mention factors you might just get a few marks off.
Ok yeah that makes a bit more sense.i mean i said what the nazis did in upholding the ideology
i didn't say an individual for the second source, and nobody in my year did
i said hitler for the first and leeched off his speeches and how it affected the party's implementation of ideology