pretty sure its x >= 1.5 just from seeing the Q? 2.5 - 0.5 = 2 and hence x = 1.5 is the min/starting value.
oohhh okay yea with trial and error its pretty quick, Thanks!pretty sure its x >= 1.5 just from seeing the Q? 2.5 - 0.5 = 2 and hence x = 1.5 is the min/starting value.
If you're looking for a way to do it, I think just substituting reasonable values should work but if you want some form of reasoning besides algebra of abs values (which seems like a pain/not worth it) then u can try graphing both |x+1| and |x-2| and seeing where the difference is exactly 2 and hence values greater than that will also solve the inequality.
This is for anything between -1 and 2 less than -1 is -3 and greater than 2 is simply 3. Justifies my working.
Some people love doing guesswork huh. Very well, The technique is to find the value where the absolute value is 0 and then find what happens before it and then find the value where the absolute value is 0 on the other side. Afterwards if there two absolute value functions find what happens in betweenpretty sure its x >= 1.5 just from seeing the Q? 2.5 - 0.5 = 2 and hence x = 1.5 is the min/starting value.
If you're looking for a way to do it, I think just substituting reasonable values should work but if you want some form of reasoning besides algebra of abs values (which seems like a pain/not worth it) then u can try graphing both |x+1| and |x-2| and seeing where the difference is exactly 2 and hence values greater than that will also solve the inequality.
work smarter not harder haha but yes i wouldn't put it on my exam paper "hi sir i just put x = 1.5 and ye the inequality works for x>=1.5 ". I would probably reason something similar.Some people love doing guesswork huh. Very well, The technique is to find the value where the absolute value is 0 and then find what happens before it and then find the value where the absolute value is 0 on the other side. Afterwards if there two absolute value functions find what happens in between
ohh so you basically just find the equations of the lines in each different region and since the 3rd region is a line of equation y=3 then y=2 will be in that middle bridging section which you then set equal to 2 and solve for x?Because I have a rather wordy explanation of the method, it would appear this approach is more complicated. It is not. I may post another similar type of question I did sometime ago.
I did a similar type of equality a few years ago: |x+1| + |x-2| = 3Because I have a rather wordy explanation of the method, it would appear this approach is more complicated. It is not. I may post another similar type of question I did sometime ago.
Not really trial-&-error; there is a logical approach to this.oohhh okay yea with trial and error its pretty quick, Thanks!