equations of motion (2 Viewers)

[kkk579]

Doing it that way wouldn’t make sense because for qs like this you’d have to square root a negative (q11)

 

[nsw..wollongong]

damn that kinda sucks, 3 hours is such a pain to like sacrifice ur day just for a tiny bit of pay

truu but i rlly like the ppl at my work so ig its nice to get out of studying for a bit while getting paid (even if it isn't that much)

 

[carrotsss]

Doing it that way wouldn’t make sense because for qs like this you’d have to square root a negative (q11)

The distance is -50m, it’s downwards

 

[kkk579]

The distance is -50m, it’s downwards

Ohh shit right

 

[kkk579]

The distance is -50m, it’s downwards

Also what did u mean for q2?

 

[carrotsss]

Also what did u mean for q2?

Your answer was still correct but you shouldn’t really have just randomly put a negative in front of the v^2, the displacement is negative because it’s going down

 

[kkk579]

View attachment 38598
Your answer was still correct but you shouldn’t really have just randomly put a negative in front of the v^2, the displacement is negative because it’s going down

Oh yeah right oopsies, i keep thinking of s as distance instead of displacement