Might be a stupid question but is it absolutely necessary to show the whole intended process for something like a 2-marker?
i.e. For a product rule differentiation, stating u(dv/dx)... formula, then substituting, factorising, etc. OR will 2 lines, one substituted into product rule and last line most simplified form, be enough?
Another example are the probability trees will I lose marks by not drawing the tree?
I get that showing everything can salvage you marks from carried errors and also potentially help ensure no mistakes, but for lower-order questions can I save time by cutting corners like the above examples?
Also can I use product rule for a differentiation question that is targeting quotient rule but doesn't explicitly state it? e.g. "Differentiate (x^2)/(x^2 +1)"?
Thank you
i.e. For a product rule differentiation, stating u(dv/dx)... formula, then substituting, factorising, etc. OR will 2 lines, one substituted into product rule and last line most simplified form, be enough?
Another example are the probability trees will I lose marks by not drawing the tree?
I get that showing everything can salvage you marks from carried errors and also potentially help ensure no mistakes, but for lower-order questions can I save time by cutting corners like the above examples?
Also can I use product rule for a differentiation question that is targeting quotient rule but doesn't explicitly state it? e.g. "Differentiate (x^2)/(x^2 +1)"?
Thank you