gunnerfan99
Member
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2019
- Messages
- 48
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2019
With all considered, probably the easiest q16 in quite a while.
assume you got 3/5for 16a), instead of using mok's method which seems like the right one, I assumed that the centres of the triangles was the origin, and just worked with c = (e^(i2π/3))b and a = (e^(-i2π/3))b. How many marks do u guys think i would lose given ii) is 2 marks and iii) is 3 marks?
View attachment 40643(from Mok's solutions)
i thought 15 was so much harder than 16With all considered, probably the easiest q16 in quite a while.
You’ve got to be kiddingWith all considered, probably the easiest q16 in quite a while.
Skill issue. Keep in mind I have the privilege of doing it at home outside of exam conditions. Everyone underperforms in their extension 2 exam.You’ve got to be kidding![]()
were u unable to prove the x>ln(x) and the roots of unity? That's tuff.i think i got like 1 mark in question 16 bruh
i swear i overperformed in all my internals, and then it comes to the main exam that counts the most, and i majorly underperform. im looking at 70 raw.Skill issue. Keep in mind I have the privilege of doing it at home outside of exam conditions. Everyone underperforms in their extension 2 exam.
70 raw will get you 92-93 which is 99.95 territory. You did well.i swear i overperformed in all my internals, and then it comes to the main exam that counts the most, and i majorly underperform. im looking at 70 raw.
i doubt that. i think 2021 alignment probs, so it will be like 90 which is kinda bad70 raw will get you 92-93 which is 99.95 territory. You did well.
not really.i doubt that. i think 2021 alignment probs, so it will be like 90 which is kinda bad
what is your constant obsession with always saying that alignment is lower no matter what paperi doubt that. i think 2021 alignment probs, so it will be like 90 which is kinda bad
idk people were saying the same thing last year with my adv math and engo hsc exams for 2022what is your constant obsession with always saying that alignment is lower no matter what paper![]()
wdym. did nesa just recycle questions??Bruh I just had a look at the paper if you went Kurt you would have seen q15 ans if you went du you would have seen q16A before. Original questions where?
fucks sake I wish I had this exam seen all the hard questions before![]()
you got 97 what are you on aboutBruh I just had a look at the paper if you went Kurt you would have seen q15 ans if you went du you would have seen q16A before. Original questions where?
fucks sake I wish I had this exam seen all the hard questions before![]()
no not the exact same question but the exact same quesiton type. I nearly didn't pay attention to the parametric vector shit when kurt was showing this kinda q cos he said it was unlikely to come lolwdym. did nesa just recycle questions??
on this note actually seeing how good kurt and du is you should buy their resources!no not the exact same question but the exact same quesiton type. I nearly didn't pay attention to the parametric vector shit when kurt was showing this kinda q cos he said it was unlikely to come lol
wait for that did we need to consider 0<x<1were u unable to prove the x>ln(x) and the roots of unity? That's tuff.