idk scaling is meant to be fair, but i feel it isnt. like imo i also think 3u and 4u math scale too well.
I was looking into a scaling statistics while making my calculator and mx2 scales a fair bit better than what it really should
if you go to table A3, the 99th %ile scaled mark for English advanced was 46.5. this implies that around 246 students received a scaled mark above 46.5 from English Advanced (and a negligible amount achieved the same from standard and EAL/D)
now, if you go to mx2 there isn’t an exact percentile for 46.5 but we do know that a scaled mark of 47.4 (which is a fair bit higher) corresponds to the 75th percentile, which implies that 818 students received a scaled mark above 47.4, and likely over a thousand received a mark above 46.5.
im pretty sure this is just a side effect of the way UAC conducts the scaling - rather than being directly based on English, mx2 is scaled based on the performance of the mx2 cohort in mx1, and then likewise for mx1 in advanced, and so as a result the scaled marks get quite inflated since the difference in performance is presumably quite large in each case - it is nonetheless interesting