nsw..wollongong
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2023
- Messages
- 4,295
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2023
huh... seems one-sided if i don't know abt this whats going oni was posting replies to wollongong as a joke
because we have beef for some reason
huh... seems one-sided if i don't know abt this whats going oni was posting replies to wollongong as a joke
because we have beef for some reason
Good to see Maram is still active.
it's ok his holy presence is no longer with ussylvia supports the genocide of the palestineans because most of them are muslim/theyre arab but still half of bos wants to worship him
now im so done with caringunban him wtf
lolcti mentioned it already but this isn't the first time the Palestine/Israel discussion had Sylvia's disgusting input, in 2021 the same thread with the same premise went down on bos and it only got locked after he started spamming pictures of dead Palestinians which is incredibly tasteless, insensitive, rude and downright tone deaf. back then there was no october 7 to keep yapping about so naturally there was probably some other trigger he was obsessed with, and he was saying the same shit 2021 version. it's so bizarre how he claims he isn't a zionist because there's no in between you either support and condone the genocide that's apparently needed for Israel to establish itself, or you don't support it. he falls in the former and always has
not disagreeing with disliking this guy but he seems like an islamophobe and not a zionist. hes also stated respect for the โh-manโ. i dont think zionists would claim himi would like israel to wipe out palestine and then iran to wipe out israel and then also wipe out saudi arabia and the other arab gulf states
and then end the islamic republic and revive zoroastrianism as the state religion of the new kingdom of greater persia
inshallah
imo by extension he's a zionistnot disagreeing with disliking this guy but he seems like an islamophobe and not a zionist. hes also stated respect for the โh-manโ. i dont think zionists would claim him
oh...i dont like jews
The ICJ is toothless because of State sovereignty. Every nation has the right to govern its own affairs free from foreign influence; there's no real pragmatic approach to the enforcement of international law outside of non-coercive sanctions and declarations. Different nations have different cultural, sociopolitical and moral frameworks; no matter how egregious or morally bankrupt we consider conduct, there's no objective measure of morality so as to conclusive determine international legality outside of countries consensually binding themselves to common standards. The principle goes both ways. In a system where sovereignty is accepted as paramount, interference with foreign affairs via force or coercion is theoretically minimised as opposed to providing a legal greenlight for any first world nation to interfere with military force upon breaches of human rights. Australia has a pretty abhorrent human rights track record itself.โThe court did not order a ceasefire, but effectively put Israel on notice over the war.โ
The ICJ is the most toothless weapon Iโve ever seen, anyone who says that human rights are not applied selectively are blind. So much for ppl on bos defending Israel for its right to self defence, where r u guys now??
i think its pretty objective that killing babies, sexually assaulting hostages and blocking humanitarian aid is not humane, regardless of what "cultural framework" you endorse inthere's no objective measure of morality
Yes, this statement is correct. It also divorces that point from all of the legal complexities that a "lack of objectivity" is conditional on. International law is primarily concerned with disputes between State actors. At what point can you attribute conduct to that of a State, and simultaneously be able to prove it to a criminal standard of beyond a reasonable doubt? Who exactly is sexually assaulting hostages and blocking humanitarian aid? Did the "State" order the conduct? I doubt you will find many situations where the exact course of conduct is sanctioned by some Head of State; analogously, at what point do we attribute corrupt conduct of an Australian Minister to the conduct of Australia as a State? There will be differing opinions from different backgrounds and legal systems as to where liability should start.i think its pretty objective that killing babies, sexually assaulting hostages and blocking humanitarian aid is not humane, regardless of what "cultural framework" you endorse in
what part of "I want Iran to conquer the entire levant and establish a neo-persian empire" did you think was a joke?imo by extension he's a zionist
it's been raised to his attention a million times that there are Christian and other faith palestinians that are being equally as ethnically cleansed as the muslims, there are also queer palestinians but sylvia only yaps about how terrible and homophobic muslims are, like that's got anything to do with the issue, so yeah he's definitely Islamophobic but he doesn't defend the other faiths and minority groups within Palestine facing genocide either. seems like he's overall in favour of Israel's establishment on stolen land
so you think the holy prophet of islam was not humane? Interesting!i think its pretty objective that killing babies, sexually assaulting hostages and blocking humanitarian aid is not humane, regardless of what "cultural framework" you endorse in