redmayne

Being against a war that one does not understand is erroneous. Best that such people refrain from such manifestations of ignorance and pursue other interests like gardening or baking.

Upon reading all of your posts, I can now surmise with absolutely no equivocation that you indeed are an intellectual invalid. Of the aforementioned instances of barbarism that you have incorporated in your 'argument', I have repudiated and laid bare every single one of them in the said thread where this dispute arose. I'll not go over them again.

Please do not post on my wall again. You have clogged it up with your pernicious and vile bacteria, and quite frankly I'm getting sick of you regurgitating the same tired argument over and over and over again.

Good luck with any future endeavors that you opt to pursue in future. ( I mean this)

I will now address your second post.

Generalisations of this magnitude are thoroughly objectionable, and are an affront to intelligence. Surely a member of the intelligentsia, as no doubt you claim to be, can comprehend that most generalisations are flawed. I won't despair though - perhaps all Aborigines are drunkards who rape their wives and abuse their children. Maybe all Jews are greedy. Certainly the Arab is a terrorist. The Black is a savage, etc. You get the underlying point I'm trying to convey to you. Conservatives are not less-educated or less worldly so abstain from making these statements.

Being of a wealthy, middle-class upbringing does not constitute culture or learning my friend. It demonstrates an unutterable stupidity and ignorance. Our good friends who roam their university campuses shouting 'Death to Bush' wouldn't even know the difference between a Pashtun and a Hazara. Yet they admonish the war effort. For shame. For shame.

Expanding on the above point for a moment; think of school teachers who work within the public system and sleep with students. Is the government an evil body for this occurrence? Should the government become a source of derision because of the actions of one individual?

I will not admit to something that I believe to be fundamentally false at every level. I have made my position on this matter unequivocally clear and I invite you to search it once more. For your benefit I'll state it again. The teachings of Christ are infallible and the doctrines which underpin Christianity as seen in the New Testament are indeed also infallible. However, such is our propensities and inclinations as human beings we invariably fail. The priests who touch children fail and the nuns who incite warfare also fail. Is this a failure of Christianity as a religion? I fervently believe this not to be the case. Instead, the failure is that of human beings who fail to discharge their responsibilities as Christians.

With all due respect, drawing inferences about my, or one's, respectability as a forum being your premise is illaudable. I have been guilty of engaging in hyperbolic pretence at one point or another throughout the course of my stay on BoS and I feel that this has led you to draw ill-based conclusions about my character. I feel this to be the case which is naturally regrettable. However I will not renege on the crux of my comments.

Your comment is wrong on so many levels. And stop neg repping me.

Btw, How much sugar do you sip with your latte'?

You're a communist aren't you?

Very rare to find open minded anglo-saxon people defending Islam. Nice to meet you