Recent content by speedie

yeah it does, they showed us on medentry its weird scaling. anyway those marks are in-f-ing-sane

did u get a UNSW interview?

oh man i have none of that... if only i were more active instead of bludging around:(

hey everyone, i was just looking at applications for courses and scholarships and such, and almost all of them ask for leadership qualities and activities... what leadership things are there? so far the ones i know of and dont have are SRC, sport captaincy, school captaincy :( i tutor...

me too. in some other thread they said a couple of ppl had already got them:S also some1 said "But i thought ALL offers/rejections were released on the 10th???" guess 2moro's the day ...! ! ! !!

what about the first one? *perform a first hand investigation to identify the products of the electrolysis of sodium chlroide

man, success one sux. theres so many more really crappy errors in the book. i really dont trust their answers. anyway, its d for sure. (sometimes there is also alot of typo's in success one)

i think i got 81/84

really? oh well i just hope i get 95+

hey lotto, i thought i got around 100, max 106- dont u think that'll get 95+? i doubt it'll get you 93...cause isnt 70/120 around 90 usually? also i heard that last year, a mark of around 95 would get you 95 scaled.. but i duno

out of 120, i'd say i got around 100-106 how about you guys? do you think i'll get over 95 scaled for my hsc aligned mark with my mark?

its definitely 0.344, but i wrote down a diff answer :S :(

1992 q2 d (ii) here, you go (x-1+i)(x-1-i) is a root = (x^2-2x+1) thus using complimenting, P(z)= (x^2-2x+1)(2x+1) (x=z), sorry

yeh i thought so too. 2003 was probably a similar difficulty.

lmao so true... what are you guys aiming for?