Search results

he guys for the 1 marker for the gp question i) and also for the sum of g.p, can som1 remember what they got?? how each one of 96% less did you guys do limiting sum and how it added up to 250 cm while 3m is more than sufficient ??

q13a)ii) 34 degress 13b) ii) 64/3 c) iii) 17/35 what was anyones answer for a)iii the co-ords of n

fark man i lost a mark from question 2 right answer but pcked the wrong fken choice!!!!!! are you sure question 8 the graph question A? i put a, someone told me its b....

no because if you look at the graph the only part that y=-k doesnt cut is below the minimum pt which is at -32

yea

202 months

was q12 c) iii)- n=13 scared of miscalculation..

yes k less than -32

is dii) volume=area v length 32.8 x 0.4/m/s x 12 1574.4??

16a) equiangular ii) x=ab/a+b b) iv) pie/6 c) discriminant = o c>0.5 part no idea

do you have any harder examples to post up :P like the change in the interest rate in the middle

nah woops i meant since u/e %=u/e over LF ** the labour force number would not change because those underemployed even if underemployment decreased will still be counted as employed.. so therefore u/e wont change??

what was the question for underemployment?? it ask if decreased underemployment will affect the u/e rate?? i think wrote since underemployed is already calculated in unemployment... changes in the underemployment >>i.e increased people working for more desired hours will not affect the...

Re: For question 28 I didnt talk about microeconomic policies? comments the question was 'discuss' meant to talk disadvantage/limitations

Re: Q28 asked to discuss government policies, were you meant to discuss monetary as w nooo i dont think so..... all policies in general monetary/fiscal/microoooo forget the technicalities of independent from government etc...... fark now im scared... i talked alot about monetary ... can...

Re: What was the last question for short answers again? yeah.. how did you guys answer this question

i did not include external stability ceebs... anyway how the fck can anyone write all 6 objectives + explain + policies aout effectiveness... hopefully i didnt lose 2 many marks for not including external stab??

Re: For question 28 I didnt talk about microeconomic policies? comments yesh labour market reform and environ policy apart of micro but if u explain others well, should be fine..... im pissed my explanation of micro policies were pretty shite.... my hand was fkced after paper 2 english and...

hey deswa what was your structure for cad??

oh shit i just rambled on about how woman increased casualised i.e increased part time and casual and men increased full-time -> i.e 38 hours of work >>greater pay etc didnt want to say anything the discrimination but ohh shit should of..