Search results

Re: Israel & Palestine haha, tell that to:

i didnt say it was anyones fault, and its a shame that you missed the light hearted nature of that particular post.

Re: Israel & Palestine um...again, an israeli source: http://www.btselem.org/English/Statistics/Casualties.asp why is it that israel finds itself killing 7 times more minors than palestinians a terrorist is someone who uses violence against civilians to push forward "some political cause"...

Re: Israel & Palestine its a question of which is better on two bad sides. and looking at those casualty figures it doesnt look too good for the israelis did you miss this part? "many of the 5,000 people killed during the 1st and 2nd Intifada were terrorists" bullshit! to be a...

oh, of course. good thinking.

8:20am - city rail commuters bound for work, half of which are distressed, frustrated, grouchy, unhappy and the rest asleep. meanwhile, howard comments on australia's strong economy, which we neednt explain to him, is established to best satisfy our needs and wants. how many commuters bound for...

Re: Israel & Palestine uh, what the heck, i'll do it for you, using an israeli source too. http://www.btselem.org/English/Statistics/Casualties.asp oh dear, seems the peaceful israel has killed nearly 6 times more than the savage palestinians since the second intifada:eek:

Re: Israel & Palestine "palestinians kill each other, so its alright for israeli's to kill palestinians"

Re: Israel & Palestine you seem to be good with sources, so perhaps you can enlighten us on the number of israeli civilians killed by pali's and the number of pali civilains killed by israeli's in the last five years. there you will find the pali deaths staggeringly larger, and there you will...

no Australia did not voluntarily go to war, john howard did, without consulting his own people, thats the difference. youre right, they shouldnt be listening to me, they should be paying more attention to the people they are trying to "liberate". if the shiites had that kind of turn out and...

yuck, the only person id have in the team on that list is farah, on the bench. btw, gower is injured, not how sure long he'll be out, though.

we're not going to look at what a player did 5 years ago are we, in terms of form and consistency dykes has been much better than anastasukis. preston campbell won the dally m award a few years ago, and he's never played origin, why not throw him at 5/8, all because he won an award some 5 years ago

dont laugh too hard, i get cramps when i do that. is iraq more stable today than it was 10 years ago? chemical weapons? oh yeah, that was the thing the US didnt have a problem with at all.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4GO54yJ_hsQ haha, so now youre saying that the words of those at the top...

:rofl: yeah thats quite typical of the US but when it comes to aussie troops and their involvement, then, being an australian born citizen, it is my business. haha, ask any human in iraq if they prefer tanks, bombs, drones, curfews, raids, blood, starvation, displacement in their lives over...

hopefully he'll be back for game one. origin will be boring without him. after tonights match at toyota park, easy solution for the NSW halves crisis - adam dykes no. 6 brett kimmorley no.7. added bonus they know each others games very well. as if adam dykes has not been playing better than...

no. so you didnt read, even the first paragraph, of the article, did you? what happened to the US' "bullet proof evidence"? if the americans wanted to "free" iraq why didnt they do that in 95 or in 2000, and finally get rid of sadam? sounds like their failure to find WMD immediately conjured...

apparently bowen and slater arent playing origin 1 http://www.leaguehq.com.au/news/origin/bowen-and-slater-to-miss-origin/2007/05/11/1178390540031.html this is outrageous, hunt is a shit full back, and i cant believe he was aust. full back for the anzac test. slater is a thousand times better

aren't you outraged that you were lied to? of course, so you dont support the iraq war anymore?

no that only became his goal when they realised there were no WMD, so instead of making themselves look like complete fools, they decided sadam was a worthy target

if you even read the article you quoted you would realise the person urinated on was one of 24 killed civilians.