Search results

I don't see how you make the conclusion the m-theory/multi-universe completely rule out naturalistic explanations. I have read, and re-read Chan737's op, he simply does not prove naturalistic explanations are insufficient. He merely asserts it. We already know this. Why are you saying this...

If your referring to Chadn737's thread, he has merely asserted that naturalistic explanations are insufficient to multiverse/M-theory and the god is more probable considered logically (God of gaps argument). He offererd no line of reasoning that says there is no possible way this could of...

Please start formatting your paragraphs at least a little bit, I'm not even gonna try and decipher your walls of text until you do.

Please learn to use paragraphs my eye's are straining as it is. :P This ones on the 1st page aswell. • Rebuttal: Prophecies prove the accuracy of my religious text Claim: The religious text contains many prophecies that have accurately been fulfilled, proving it is a divine source...

Mate i was merely refuting his point, you just took a shot at another theist (he was the one arguing the Conservation of Energy as proof of God.). Where does your line of reasoning conclude that God is the only thing that could have created the singularity? You have merely asserted this. So...

I'm saying i don't have a fucking clue. Anything i say would be pure speculation at best, however i don't jump to any conclusions like, theory X is correct or this model is wrong etc.

Yes my point exactly SOMETHING must have been there. You my friend jump to the conclusion that this something is God. And FFS at least put a little effort in typing up your posts.

Mate my point is simply that you are jumping to the conclusion that the only possible conclusion is God did it, while ignoring any other possible explanation. You have provided basically a God of the gaps in science argument.

1st That was just an example it used. The point is still valid. 2nd The same way equal forces in opposite vectors sum 0. You still have yet to explain to me why you think Goddidit, while completely ruling out naturalistic explanations.

• Rebuttal: Rebuttal: First Law of Thermodynamics Claim Claim: The first law of thermodynamics says matter/energy cannot come from nothing. Therefore, the universe itself could not have formed naturally. Response: Formation of the universe from nothing need not violate conservation of...

This while, coming from the enemy, is true.

You wanting to believe in something is irrelevant to it being actually true.

Don't confuse her, Atheism is not a religion.

Then maybe you should re-read page 853 (i think) again.

But i witnessed a miracle of the Noodle, if i wrote this in a book, by your logic you should convert to Pastafarian :P

cept the satanism church is not what you think. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_of_satan The Nine Satanic Statements outline what "Satan" represents in the Church of Satan. 1. Satan represents indulgence instead of abstinence 2. Satan represents vital existence instead of spiritual...

but he has surely touched me, certainly this means that once i tell you this you will convert to the Pastafarian Religion.

but surely this means Achilles may have been immortal?

ok, maybe you are a troll.

Relevant as Phrenology is to Psychology perhaps?