Search results

that's ludicrous. it doesnt even make electoral sense, how many votes would they get out of that. rather the direct action plan is an alternative to the carbon tax for the sake of having an alternative. by voting lib, i trust them not to introduce this; not to do anything to stop emissions...

Back on topic. Lentern: please explain why we should have a carbon tax (or whatever u want to call it) if we will not make an even noticeable difference to climate change. i dont kno why this argument isnt being pushed hard enough!

+1

this is correct you are 3rd

+1

This guy helped me out in my very unusual maths question. His response to my question contained very fundamental techniques and concepts which I had never seen before, although I have been to "famous" tutors. Definitely try him out, I doubt you'll regret it!

what benefit? plz explain?

any way labor are the most corrupt lot you'll ever come across

if this cant be explained. then debate closed!

i find it amazing that pro carbon tax ppl cant explain why we need this environmental tax that will do nothing to help the environment u can quote polls as much as u like... thats walking around the main issue, which is the above

i realise ur on my side. but r u implying that you'd support a tax which lost everyone money? to fund gillards extravagance. i dont trust her with any money, let alone more than previous govts.

u havent countered any of my arguments, you've just said that heaps of people believe/believed/should believe your argument and my initial comment was re a proper carbon tax scheme, without the wealth redistribution package... ill leave that for others to argue

u greens just keep saying that. what wealth and prosperity? because if it's anything to do with the environment (i assume it is!) then even if aust stops emissions and goes back to the stone age, it will not make a difference at all. if ur gonna go on about moral obligation... that's...

so let me get this straight: bos sends uac raw and aligned marks, uac uses raw marks for scaling, but uses aligned marks for table.

Is the hsc mark quoted in this table the raw mark or aligned? it makes sense that it is the raw mark since alignment is a completely separate process conducted by bos not uac. however, that means that ppl in the past 3/4 years have been getting full marks in maths extension 2 (v hard to...

it hasn't been there since the 1986 (I think). this is likely bcoz it is time consuming and repetitive, as well as the fact that some ppl consider T(0) - (cambridge) to be first term, and some ppl consider T(1) to be - (?MIF?) this results in different expressions for T(k+1)/T(k)

i disagree. i reckon they just say that so ppl who havent picked up a book all year dont kill themselves from stress

no, on the contrary, ur solution is excellent and should definitely be awarded full marks. what is wrong is when people started with the answer and then reached 0<theta<2pi, coz the question says it is "only" possible, this just shows that it is possible congrats on what i perceive to be an...

obviously been doing too much maths

3aii should be 3, 327, 500, 000