Search results

i just followed the recommended program of study ive encountered the same problem. for me it also says that i need academic approval for doing >14cp in sem2 maybe they just havent entered the academic approval info into the system - cos i remember some guy approving the 15cp on our timetable...

yeah me too, i couldnt find a way of having at least a day off. are you doing actuarial studies alone, or a double degree? did you follow the recommended program of study? how many credit points per semester are you doing? excuse the blunt questions, i just want to know if theres anybody else...

oh i see, i was worried there for a while

in the B com (acst) / B Eco program, they recommend doing 15cp in second semester. whats with that?

lol...other jews

we had a three marker safety question in our option in the 06 paper. its bound to come somewhere each year, if not in your hsc, then in your internal assessments

i think of it like this: hydration, we want to add water, so we can use dilute (cos it has lots of H2O) dehydration, we want to remove water, so we introduce minimal H2O to the system, thus concentrated

its to do with enthalpy, that is the amount of energy in the bonds. since propanol has the most amount of chemical bonds it requires the most amount of energy for them to be broken - hence more heat energy is released from the system once broken (remember energy can not be destroyed)

put rt3+i in the equation given, do the same for rt3-i, since the coefficients are real the conjugate is also a root. then using simult equations find c and e...then division? im not sure

B Com(actuarialstds) / B Eco at macquarie was tossing up between that and the science combination - but thatll do

jeez, which is it? make up your mind so because the deaths are more dilute it makes it ok? no, because cars are not designed to kill, but guns are. now what would somebody such as yourself be doing walking the dark streets of a lebanese neighbourhood?

this article from the smh makes interesting reading http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/spot-the-difference/2007/01/04/1167777208652.html i have doubts over whether it was due to some technical problem. i recall a similar incident on fox news when they labelled mark foley, the guy accused of...

G W Bush for liberating the people of iraq and afghanistan, he's not too far off the nobel peace prize either

they were all killed by the deadly indiscriminate bombing raids at the start of the war. because he has a "responsibility" to the iraqi population under international law. and the mere fact that he doesnt apologise highlights the fact that he has no sympathy for the iraqi's, which he claims...

whose fighting for god?

wow, you really do have nothing

http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/another-year-another-grieving-family/2007/01/01/1167500061816.html an article that tells of 3000 US soldier deaths in iraq i dont seem to recall an article that commemorated the mark of 3000 iraqi deaths...oh yeah....it happened too quickly...before anybody...

the entire notion of multicultralism is i think overrated in australia. if we were to take a stubborn argument - australia contains lebs, italians, canadians etc, meaning there are many cultures making us multicultral. that would mean all countires are multicultral the way our politicians boast...

well if the US really wanted a "free and liberal iraq" then one would assume that it would do everything in its power to protect the iraqis from a NK nuke as it would do to protect its own US citizens at home. that means iraqi territory would be immune to any foreign threat just as the US...

under international law any occupying force is responsible for noncombatant civilians - if international law is ever followed or upheld these days bush can still be held accountable for the other 10% anyway