Search results

how the fuck would you know that?

Systems and contingency theories are different theories and shouldn't be made into a single entity.

Add's 10 points to hawtness aswell.

ring wing :)

Go live in america and hope the republicans win the election.

fucken olol.

wayy to many eastys on this forum board. shit fashion sense.

You wear a retero tight singo underneath, roll up the sleaves, and wear board shorts.

Oh to the OP, flanno's are awesome. Wear baggy trackies, possbily slippers (or fat skate shoes), and a sick kunt hat. Oh and have a longneck of VB in your hand. If i were a chick, yer baby dat. ahk.

should he be wearing pants in the pics??!?!?!?

They were both equally shit.

This is how i see it. The straight PPF diagram is just giving a theoretical visual representation of the theory of opportunity cost. In reality, or real world economies, the line will never be straight, as the opportunity cost doesn't work in equal segments of trade off. The concave...

humour has innovated since that time. In other words its shit now, but would be funny in 1859.

would be funny if it were the year 1859.

haydos is bombing them. SHould go alright if he can stay in for another 20 overs.

yep we are eternally fucked.

wtf at seeing a 13 year old (year 8'er) at macca's at 3 in the morning.

either way, labour is shit.

Something of value, in which can be readily bought and sold (ie. is demand and supply for/of it)

Umm the government could run budget deficits like in the US, where they adopt a more regressive taxation system. And nooooo consistent budget deficits would not strain a country's foreign debt, or further strain the CA.