Search results

yeah but for a teacher =p

im off to skool now =( GOOD LUCK YA'LL (here's hoping that its a straight forward test)

reading time: skim read harder questiosn, start multiples =p

Identification of tasks ( needs and objectives) gannt charts ( time management) Logbooks identification of subgoals Allocation of resources (outsourcing) identification of major milestones and stumbling blocks (?) regular backup response to difficulties reugalr reporting evalutaion...

ah another fresh day! yes indeed... no sleep last nite =( ah well the caffeine will do Good Luck Ya'll =D

mr Z won 5 grand? dammit andrew, why didnt u tell me before =p woo go Manly!

procedures return nothing. they may change global variables, thats it.

ehheeh.... i like my plan... wake up sometime at 11, eat, go to school... complain to teacher bout some syllabus points he never taught us, do test, go to concert, go to party, completely forget everything i know about software =p

whopps i made that unclear... i was trying to say, the lower the average mark of the test, the higher the scaling? so if like many ppl got band 4ish, it gets scaled up coz its "too hard"... im hoping here =p

depends if theyve been really putting in the effort from the trials till now... but in general, for most subjects, what your overall school based mark is, is pretty close to what you will get in hsc

i dont think queries is solid for proving logcal paradigm. A goal is better: 15 show_capital(X), and for anyone else in confusion, lines 23 - 27 are all rules

oh man, have any of you checked the prelim course for pm techniques? its LOADED! =p Identification of tasks ( needs and objectives) gannt charts ( time management) Logbooks identification of subgoals Allocation of resources (outsourcing) identification of major milestones and stumbling...

i dunno if im right, but isnt it the more worse people go in the hsc, the more it gets scaled up?

hmmm this is sorta depressing hearing all these ppl who are gonna fail when im aiming for top ten =( cheer up! and good luck! =D i think past papers are more valuable than knowing the content. sure u need to know it to an extent, but applying it to scenarios is where most people go wrong.

it isnt rare to get over 55%... thats just tales to make students feel better? its not a subject thats hard to understand. Once u learn it, revise it a bit, and your set. the content is easy to lean and apply in most situations, just needs constant effort. i got an avg of 96.6% school based...

eh... good point. how bout whoever gets freakishly high in sdd... has a completely unrelated accident... yes that will do... just joshin

DFD's are easily related to most simple systems. How many are you planning to make? as 1 DFD wont be enough for a farily large complex system (such as a rts). the easiest way to relate DFD's to any problem is to try viewing the pseudocode aspect of it, not the actual programmed bit (i.e. VB)...

outside source = people bribe them = cheating.... go figure but hopefully bos wont stuff it up this time round

i wish i saw this thread first before that extensive reply on the other one =(

timgurto, sounds fairly intensive there... im wandering are you doing sdd accelerated? coz if you not, dont choose a hard project that will take up lots of time, coz yur gonna also have to concentrate on other subjects for hsc. really basic projects are enough, just put lots of effort into the...