Search results

I was watching tv and a news report came out on HSC results. Apparently 45 people got 100UAI and girls beat boys by 1% overall.

omg sam 2005. its been a long wait. that would be great if we get it by friday

thankyou!! maybe it will start to get through to nedzelic the thick headed fagot

ill go for whoever i want. all im saying is that australia have no chance, they were lucky to qualify. if it wasn't for croatians what would make up the australian team. pft shut the fuck up mate and grow a cock

Australia has had misfortunes with all the countries in its group. Taken from "http://www.alphalink.com.au/~warrior/ausz1998.htm". talking about Croatia's 7-0 victory over Australia in 1998: "This surely takes over as the worst performance ever by an Australian team as surpasses the 4-1 loss...

is it true there is a friendly between Australia and Croatia. Because if there is its very stupid. bad timing

2006 wont be a good year for australia. I hate how craig forster is talking up Australia. He was saying how they will beat croatia and japan. He was talking about the histories of the teams n stuff but technically they are totally different teams now. Im croatian and i reckon croatia will prob...

It's harder to get a higher mark in standard english than advanced english. someone correct me if im wrong but it was only reported that 2 people got band six results in standard english last year. It's not more work, u still get the AOS + 3 Modules. The texts are just more complex to analyse...

thanks buddy.

Seeing that your UAI is derived from your Raw HSC Exam Marks and Raw School Assessments does that mean if Person A has studied the same subjects as Person B and got the exact same HSC Marks their UAI's still will not be the same as their raw marks are all different? Thanks

How do these Rounds work? like whats the difference between the Main Round and the Late Round? im confused. if we get the uai dont we automatically make the course im confused.

someone agrees with me finally. i thought i was wrong.

are there any teachers here to clarify 17. i put b but i was having doubts after people said it was A.

Shit. i get it now

Oh yeah thats right. The government can use Domestic Market Operations (DMO) through the RBA. THey can take out a form of expansionary monetary policy to increase the cash rate and therefore stop spending and increase savings within the economy. In the long term this will lower the CAD.

um not sure but..... encouraging public savings is one way we can get rid of CAD. Look up the "Twin-deficits hypothesis" someone just asked it in a thread.

because supply is so low prices go up (appreciation of the dollar) and the goods are demanded more. simple as that

again you are wrong. If our dollar has appreciated that means that we can buy more of foreign products at a cheaper price. Now as the dollar as appreciated consumers will buy more from overseas. How the hell can imports be reduced. Unless there is protection but the question says nothing about that.

I really have no idea about this question are u missing something? National Income is calculated by C+I (which is aggregate demand). The only thing i have figured out from this table is the MPC which is 0.8 Change in Consumption = 800 Change in Income = 1000 800/1000 = 0.8

Yes the likely cause is C. Its common sense. If you went to a shop where they were selling widgets for $100 but at kmart down the road they sold them for $80, would'nt you buy them from the shop down the road? Well in b it said "exports will increase". How the hell can exports increase if...