Search results

thats physics for ya.......atleast ull grab a mark for stating the right thing..maybe more if they are generous

how did Bohr refined rutherfords model?? plz tell me its about his postualates plz???

ok thanx......im hoping its right.....if it is,....then ill say the option was good....assuming ive got the other stuff right....i chose he right natural occuring reaction which was number 2..but i think i jusitfied it in a wrong way.....i said some rubbish that a neutrino is used to balance the...

im with "walla"............walla man, eddy currents have nothing to do with the question.......all they wanna know is what the difference in both is......which i think is that the first one, nothing will happen coz even if current is induced, there is no complete circuit.....however, in the...

ok sounds like everyone is on the right track....thats good then......it scared me coz it was a 3 mark question and it was so simple.......i think

who picked number 3 and wat did they say about it??.......can we say it has a practical application in nuclear reactors??

did people just use the normal force between two wires with the current being the same at 2 amps

wat did u put and how did u do it??

Question 8----- Vp over Vs= Np over Ns 240 over 6000= Np over Ns 1 over 25= Np over Ns----------->cros multiple and u get : Ns=25Np therefore 1:25...............wat have i done wrong so that the answer isnt B???

Question 8----- Vp over Vs= Np over Ns 240 over 6000= Np over Ns 1 over 25= Np over Ns----------->cros multiple and u get : Ns=25Np therefore 1:25...............wat have i done wrong so that the answer isnt B???

is the graph a straight line or wat???

do both of them swing or just the second one coz thecircuit is completed with the copper wire.....whereas the first one isnt??.......or am i just talking crap?

i dnt entirely agree with quetion 8 being c.......wat did everyone have as the primary voltage??

i said its the same coz gravity doesnt act horizontally...on vertically.......and the vertical component is independent of the horizontal component (as stated by galileo)....therefore although the vertical might change due to gravity......the horizontal may still be the same...........thats wat...

yeh the wording was a bit annoying........i ended up putting d

was the quanta to quarks section hard or was it just me that foudn it hard?? wrote like 4-5 pages for that 8 mark question....dnt ask about wat

yeh i equated the centripetal force formula witht he qvb thing...talked about mass dilation and also e-mc sqaured

i think the answer for the first part........was simply the gradient.....that is, 1.85m/s.....u know, rise over run........not too sure but wat u rekon??......the grpah was fuked and even the question after that

i think question 9 is a trick question........i dnt think ur supposed to do the sin60........but the sin30.....coz if u look at it, that isnt the angle..........not 100% sure.......but i put (b) as the answer

last years exam was freakin easy.......im getting scared coz i rekon its gonna be hard man, similar to the 2unit maths paper