Search results

*old/new syllabus = old/new HSC

not necessarily, that's how the old syllabus worked in the new syllabus, since its outcome based, ur percentile doesnt equate to the band u receive. there cud b 0.5% of the state getting band 6 (as proven in studies of religion last yr) or >30% getting the highest band (like in 3u maths...

then again, they asked this qstn last yr didnt they? chances r they cant chuck an 6/8-marker in this yrs paper

Minai where r u gettin these figures from? I hope ure not gettin me 2 happi 4 nuttin hehe :D cos from wat ure telling me, ive got a band 6 *yay*

omgosh stop stressing dude the mark in the newspaper is the HSC mark, which is like sum1 above me just sed (sorri cant rmb the nick) the average of ur school assessment mark & exam mark. depending on ur rank in ur class, ur school assessment mark & the rest of the state (i'm not sure abt...

like sum dude/chick sed on another forum thread, the ppl here don't exactly represent a cross section of the candidature - there's a hell of alota smarties on this forum, so don't stress if u rekon u ddin't go that well

*phew* tnx laz :D

hahaha...bravo! bravo! its abt time sum1 tell him 2 put a sock in it.

haha...that's God with a capital 'G'! :D

what's so bad abt UTS? ok, so the cutoffs r lower than syd & nsw, & the building is a tad ugly but theres not much else thats goin against it is there?

yeah same, i rekon it was easier than the catholic paper however qstn 10 was just stupid, esp. cos the derivative qstn was worth only 2 marks! pretti gud paper

arghhhhhhh r u serz laz? i think i stuffed up that qstn then =/ my focus was -11 3/4 (or sumthing like that) n0o0o0o0o...........!!

yeah the paper was a bit stupid 4 eg. qstn 10, the derivative qstn.. i spent 1/2 hr working it out n then realised it was FREAKING ONLY WORTH 2 MARKS

sorri my scanner doesnt work on windows xp :mad1: its just sitting there gathering dust cant u get the paper on the Board of studies website?

got 101/120 in the trial n i rekon i did a tad better this time my est. - 105/120

qstn 7 was straight outta the coroneous textbook, if only i rmb/ed how 2 do them n yeah from 1-5 the qstns were ok-gud, apart from the inverse functions one which i got stuck in, n the general solutions which i did the wrong way (as a normal solution, not general) :mad1: n qstn 6.b? i...

yups i did, i didn't like the qstns...i was totally prepared 4 a qstn abt Weimar since it's the last yr they';re teaching it in depth n i was hoping the BoS wuddn't b a bunch of wankers n leave it out this yr... i did part a as well, thought it sounded pretti bad :( n on the bloody Cold...

omgosh thats slack... he was prolly aiming really high n now hes just thrown it all away!!!

i thought the catholic trials were alot easier 4 germany & cold war germany: b/cos the paper had weimar :D cold war: b/cos the qstns were broader, like the 1 on containment. in the hsc paper, they had 2 chuck sum bs stuff abt only one crisis & then one on groups (which we barely touched...

is that sumthing u made up or is that actually tru stuff? cos now im freaking out :confused: i left space 4 my title but 4got 2 put it in