Search results

thank god.. that kid above almost gave me a heart attack.

yeah i put 4.0 but that was an educated guess - i was at pains on that fukn qn spent ages on it.. otherwise 14/15 so im pretty happy.

must admit, i lolled pretty hard. dedication, going through and picking all those quotes.

:| i average about 7.5 and thought my 12.5 on family was plenty lol.. i could have got a few more pages for each of my sections if my pen didnt leave the paper (i spend a lot of time in the exam thinking), but 33 pages on one response is crazy. physically impossible. i feel sorry for the...

how many words per line?

weve established that the NAIRU may have ben miscalculated.

maybe, but i dispute ur whole hidden unemployment argument altogether, because of the word 'initial'. and dont post back to say 'u got it! hidden unemployment will intially become unemployed!' i just dont accept that argument ok? lol.

lol. *hangs head in defeat* its still C.

well i dont know how many frictionally unemployed people there are, so i cant offer an argument there. look, im going to give this a rest lol. if someone else posts on here with something new, ill resume my campaign. i say it C. thats what i think. the end. lol. PS id LOL if they accepted...

100% agree. i got excel maths and successone maths. they are helpful, but unfortunately i didnt use them until like 2 days before my exam. they are consice and give practice questions. unless ur legal/re/english teachers are hopeless, i think what you get in class is far superior.

well i still assume that those 1.3 million (or even some of them), will not initially seek employment - there would need to be an obvious trend towards growth that would encourage them. frictionally unemployed people are ready to go - they just need a job to move into - easily attainable if...

no, but woolies can hire a lawyer to operate the registers or stack the shelves. an increase in demand wont require more lawyers anyway - itll require retail and manufacturing jobs more i assume. assembly line people, waiters, cashiers, shelf stackers, box packers etc. dont need skills to...

lol at lilley.matthew, you have some good arguments there, and i agree that the answer is C but i will LOL so hard if in the end BOS pays A; truly pwned in that case lol. i stand by my frictional case.

often the syllabus/BOS has nothing to do with the real world.

i put fairness. justice seemed too obvious/sweeping statement sort of thing. rule of law = justice?? i think justice requires a little more than just rule of law. however, rule of law can provide fairness. meh .. legal multiples, what did people expect.

hahah just an observation but u do the same subjects as me! except i do SOR 1unit and not IPT. lol. legal was ok in prelim i think, but toward the end, as someone said, it just got stupid. effectiveness effectiveness effectiveness. legal remedies. commitment to the law.. never again!!

crime - 12 (about 10 real pages considering A and B were 2 lines each) family - 12.5 consumer - 10 writing tends to get bigger towards the end (crime would be about 8 per line, extendeds about 7-7.5 words per line)

10 for consumers, 12.5 for family. 10 all up for crime (including like 2 lines for each parts a and b)

i agree. look tbh, if after all they pay A, i can see why. it makes sense. im not disputing your reasoning, runnable. its just that I see C as the more correct answer.. however if you end up right, theres no hard feelings :)

well initially, those who are frictionally unemployed will get jobs quicker to satisfy supply shortfalls. frictionally unemployed people are part of the unemployment rate, hence when they get jobs it directly influences the unemployment rate. i still think that hidden unemployed people will not...