Search results

I think the raw mark to get an E4 will be between 60 and 65% considering that Ext 1s raw mark is 70% and Ext 2 is harder and still 35% of the people that do it get an E4. Also i to have been hovering around the 80 mark in the trails although i am just starting to do them and study at all...

i have done 4 papers and i got 14, 10, 4 and 14. The 4 i went really bad through the whole paper i was not thinking right but the other i have been going all right on. I just cant seem to nail every question every test has a question where i get 5 or 6 and most i get 11s and 12 even the first...

If X comes second 2 Y then they will both get the same mark after both the marks are brought together.

58-62 is E4(90) in Ext 1 so i thing it would be about 75 that would be about 95 that is an extra 15 marks and only going up 5. Could even be a little less. Ext 2 i expect to be about 65%. as Ext 1 is 70% and ext 2 is harder.

I did it in 2 of the trials i have done. Thought it was graphs first question and it was early in the morning (when im at my worst). I made up for it with 14 in question 8.

Today i did 2 ext 2 papers and will do english 2 hours tonite.

MX2 Scales easily the best out of any subject and the closest to it is MX1. I would suggest doing Ext 2 as it scales so well and you will probably like doing it if you want to do engineering so it will be easier to study for.

The third step is usually the hardest and you usually have to use the second step in it. I dont know what you want explained. You just have to prove that it works for K + 1 and then as it works for 1 it will work for 2 and it will work for 3 etc.

1 Ext 2 Paper 1 Ext 1 Paper + marking them.

By the raw marks in 2004 58 - 62 / 84 (about 70%) in Ext 1 got you a E4. I think Ext 2 will be considerably lower then that. So maybe even around 60% will get you an E4.

They both actually work much more then me. But i was stupid not to work i would not advise it. I am looking at a lower HSC mark now because of it. However if i did it again i would do the same thing.

Hmm the CSSA trials made me stuff up. I didnt go as well as i expected in Ext 1 only get 60/84 and Ext 2 66/120. In both i had off days (probably due to the stress) i hope it doesnt happen again. That is why i have been doing 8 hrs of maths a day for the last 3 days and will for the next week.

Im ranked 2/4 still. The guy that was first i would have to of been working all year to beat as he worked all year and i was never gonna do that. So really no harm done.

What sort of raw mark do you think is needed to get an E4 in Ext 2 and a 95+ in Ext 1.

Hmm all these people saying that you needed to do 2 hours a day of maths everyday all year. What a joke. I didnt even do the work in class cause im too lazy let alone any at home. Cram sess 2 days before each test is all i did and even those cram sessions were only about 6 hours a day. Thats...

I would want to have done study every day. But in reality i would never have done this.

Re: 回复: Re: Board Of Studies reveals raw marks - 2003 OK that makes me so happy. The raw marks are so low. Anybody know any numbers for pe??

How accurate are these

Im doing ext 2 maths pretty much non stop. I have english essays which i cant adjust and will do some work on it again next week. At the moment it is all maths. BTW i got 96% in Pe 93% in chem 86% odd for ext 1 but i went terrible in ext 2 and got only about 70% english 83% i think That was...

What is stopping me from getting higher would it be the english??