Search results

yeah.. general changes for scientific thinking.. i wrote something like it laid the groundwork for future scientists blah blah blah.. but didn't mention society specifically cause i couldn't be bothered

okay okay.. this seems like a bit of a controversy.. is that the word?... personally this question took a bit of thinking for me Personally I wrote something along the lines of what Mathematician said.. both solenoids will move to the left... yet in slightly different manners.. the second one...

thats what i wrote.... as well as that it is repulsive

good work.. i blabbered on too.. but i did 4 pages:p

eh... i believe he did magnetic field first.. then applied the electric field to cancel out the deflection

yes.... Q2Q guys should not have an advantage- seeing as it was part of the core.. the stuff in the core section will be from the core section.. silly as it may sound.. that is true.. therefore u just need to make the basic correlations i mentioned in my earlier post:p

90+ raw lets see if we can get 93-94:p

to put it in context.. we also have relativistic velocities:p because length and time contracts.. thus there are also relativistic velocities for each frame of reference lol i shall stop. not required:d

err.. not exactly.. we are talking about electrons and the development of CAT and PET heres an outline of the four page essay i wrote on it:p: - nice fluffly intro - explain how CAT works, using X-Rays - explain the need for the understanding of electrons, explaning how X-Rays are produced...

medical physics: the eight mark was a killer- i believe its a real discriminant.. u really have to know ur stuff to get it.. it was about the understanding of electrons how did that provide a key role in the development of CAT and PET scans:p

sheesh yes it was a tricky question i used the relationships: f=mv^2/r and related this to f=ma... as mass increases relativistically given by the lorentz transformations, the force required to keep the radius constant increases... as f=ma 'doh! now u gotta relate the increase in force...

yeah me too.. i got close to half.. but not exactly half it was an irrational number with surds and stuff

i think yumi meant percentage= percentage wise i hopefullly should get 80%~which is about 67*84- i wanna E4 desperately

btw that one about the volume (definite integral) without evaulating it... i wrote the lny one.. but seeing as 2unit does not cover that we can alternatively evaluate the area under the curve dx ways... so u do (5-whatever the curve was)^2 and times by pi to get the volume.. if u get what i...

i hope 3u will be straightforward and easy :p i don't want my trial mark i got it was crap

*crosses fingers.. if i get my trial mark i will er.... (my trial mark was 116/120)

10 b was easy lol not really the very last last part was hard- i'll prolly get 1 outta 2....but seriously.. look @ 2002 HSC and u'll kill urself if u didn't do it.. its practically the same question- have a close look at q10 of last years one

they care about dodgy answers!:p well thats wat i care about

i wrote.. how the context shapes the text.. presenting evidence ie.quotes but i finished with something along the lines that the text and its context are intimately related:p btw my english teacher looked at the paper.. and said it was one of those very general questions... like the ones...

6.5 6.5 6.5 my writing is about 11 words/line- so bit smaller than average i guess