Lol I kinda dismissed the friedrich and brzezinski in the first paragraph saying how its crap.. and almost half of mine was like one the leadership structure. Talked about society, terror, conformity/dessent but not in much detail. Oh well hope that's what they want..
Hmm.. maybe. I thought it was a generic question on main events of his life like always - the "public life" meant like, less emphasis on when he married and how he died while having sex etc. I dunno, that was my interp :)
It's always this section where I lose the most marks, like 5+ or something (anyone else like this?). Hopefully I should be fine this time, maybe only lose a couple of marks cus I wrote quite alot to make sure. :)
I liked the 2nd speer question actually.
When I was reading it I thought I didn't have much to write but was surprised when I actually had an attempt - had plenty to talk about.
I reckon there's basically no reason to do standard. If you're serious about getting a decent UAI (98+), the band 5 cap (in reality) for standard is gonna hurt you. I mean, you'd have to be at the very top of Standard to get a band 5/6, in which case you've probably got the ability to get a band...
I'm pretty sure that if you come to a conclusion which is contradictory to the norm in the HSC, they won't mark you down for it. Internal marking was always fairly dodgy and subjective.
Haha.. eco is in aaages for me! Plenty of time to cram after Modern History. Yeah I know it could be hard since the Catholic was pretty easy - there were alot of 90+ raws.