I guess your moral objection to violence then should be taken with no greater assuredness than my moral claim that random unprovoked violence for fun is moral.
On what ground do you reason and assure yourself that your moral claim is correct, and could you refute that my moral claim may be the...
The irony is that a lot of the libertarians on this board will simultanously argue morals are relative or nihilistic, no absolute morals exists (e.g. d nolan, riet).
While simultaneously denouncing cultural relativism and the practices of Islamic states, Aussie Abos, that are interpreted as...
Your problem iron is you're too concerned with immoral action, where all the problems in the world are from moral inaction, moral agents who willfully spur and disdain pursuing a righteous course of action.
I don't know what harm may have been caused by liberalization of community attitudes to...
1994 FZR600
First impression is of an extremely narrow, light machine, taking into consideration the model was first sold over 20 years ago. Sitting on and just pushing it around, It feels exactly like a CBR250. Nothing like comparable bikes of the time like the CBR600f2, which are fat and tank...
Re: Strong and effective climate change policy, that doesn't involve a great, big new
The easiest way for Australia to meet emissions reduction targets is to completely phase out cattle farming.
I really liked all the stuff on the stratos and replica, best cars.
The guys who built the replica were absolutely livid, there's a big whinge on the lancia forums about how top gear wrecked an engine, cracked the fibreglass body, and the cars performance and build was slated...
I am pro-freedom above all else, always and forever.
I'd only prefer less muslim immigration because islam tends to be extremely conservative, and muslims will vote and lobby for socially conservative policy. I'd prefer no immigration by anyone who holds conservative politics.
To take these...
Don't you feel slightly unethical, supporting restrictions on something that could bring someone much happiness, when you've implicitly agreed that it causes no harm to anyone else to allow them to have their relationships recognized as a full marriage?
How does placing restrictions on who can...
You're missing the point, which is that in no way should their actions be restricted because of your preference, and it is oppressive, it's a bare faced insult to the right of others who would wish to view and honor their marriage as fully equal to a heterosexual one.
You support the...
If the title is important to them, why should they be denied that title?
The issue of the title is an implicit undermining of their relationship, it is a refusal to acknowledge that their relationships are fully equal to heterosexual relationships, fuck that.
It's fine for you to hold that belief, problems begin when you demand legislation (which is to say, maintaining the legislative status quo) that restricts individuals from forming what they believe is a valid sacred union.
To give you an example, I oppose gun ownership and muslim immigration, I...
But why should your preference that they shouldn't be allowed to marry, override the preference of those who would like to allow homosexual marriage?
Why should we respect your opposition to marriage? What if I said all interracial marriage should be prohibited, would I be any less justified...