Search results

I fuked up the graph of 9 :(. I don't know why but i had the curve starting from below the axis and as x approached infinity i had y approaching 0 from above. I think 9 was just a bad question for me and i stopped thinking clearly. ahh well should at least pick up 1 or 2 marks for showing where...

That's what i got. Wasn't sure about part (iii).

that rings a bell for the repayments question. Not that it matters a great deal now, but you can always check this answer by putting it back into the original equation you had. if you subbed the value in the equation would have worked out to be 800000. At the moment i think i'm looking at...

I brought water into my exam, didn't feel the need to piss. Made sure i didn't drink to much beforehand though. When i finished i only had a couple things that i wanted to check over and i had 15 mins left at the end. I was pretty thorough the entire way through though. Took my time and tried to...

Ye that's the answer i got. Feels good man.

Ye that's exactly what i did and got the 6.93 bit.

I did this slightly different but got the same answer. Now that i see the way Tavin did it i don't know why that didn't occur to me. I doubled the intensity from part (ii) and worked out the loudness. Then i took this new number and subtracted the loudness from part (ii) and got like 6.9... So...

My thoughts exactly. For 1-8 i killed it and 10 as well. I just hope that 9 and any silly mistakes that may have happened earlier don't let me down too much.

i got ln2/0.1

I thought the paper was fairly standard for questions 1-8. I didn't do very well on questions 9 but was surprised by how easy 10 was. Probably made a few stupid mistakes here and there but i should end up somewhere between 100-110, which is what i've been getting in past papers as well. What...

so you need a raw mark of over 90% to get scaled to 90%? You must have done well lol. I thought it was pretty standard stuff up to question 8 inclusive. Question 9 i did pretty poorly on but luckily 10 was easy as this year.

Probably a good idea to do 2009 and 2010 paper as 2011 should be quite similar.