Tbh the notes you have dont necessarily correlate with your mark.
An analogy that may be suitable is this. I race Usain Bolt in a 100 metre sprint. He has to carry a 10kg bag and have one arm tied around his back. Whilst he will still beat me, its not mecessarily because his method of running...
Ah ok, hence why I asked if anyone else thought that, because I didnt take any subs that required that many notes and I was like "wow lol thats like a textbook" haha
If the student feels as if they are not gaining much out of the tutoring or they want more, it is their obligation to stop and find a new tutor if they wish. You do not really need to compare tutor to tutor, its all about the student and whether or not they feel comfortable with their tutor...
this notion that the questions will/will not favour you should not be an issue. It either means
a) You lack confidence in the exam and are trying to attribute your performance to luck and how the questions favour you
b) You are weaker in some topics than others, again something you can change...
Well fortunately students feel more inclined to work hard in Year 12 so this can be easily rectified. In year 11 I was getting in the 70s for most of my 3u assessments but in year 12 my marks improved dramatically.
an interpretation of a text is never wrong unless you can't back it up with technical analysis and justifying how the technique conveys a certain view.The only times the marker will criticise your interpretation will be when you can't back up how you came up with that and if this interpretation...
Are the marks you lost in maths primarily due to:
1) silly mistakes
2) you cbf'ed to study efficiently
3) for some other reason you didn't study enough
4) problems with understanding the mathematical concepts
?
Uni is what you make of it. If u dont socialise, get involved, have no interest in ur course it will be terrible. If u socialise, get involved and enjoy ur course it is amazing