Search results

astrophysics. i thought it was actually pretty good. 'twas definitely better than the core...pity bout the fact that its worth 1/3 wat the core is.

Hey, i was just wondering (i've already posted this somewhere, but now can't remember where lol). but anyways, i was wondering: suppose u accelerated in one 2 unit subject in yr 11, and u got a band 6, and then you manage 8 units of band 6 in yr 12 (when u actually do all your exams)...would...

yeh, thas wat i did. and i only have 9 other units this year, and i'm def not gonna get a band 6 in eng ext, so...... damn. wonder who DUS kno????

i have a question about the premiers award. (the all rounder one) say u accelerated in one 2 unit subject last year (ie in yr 11), and u got a band 6, and then you get 8 units of band 6 this year, wen u actually d all your other exams. Dus this mean u CAN'T be an all-rounder? or do the 2 units...

meh. i was really scared about chem and bio and physics, but now that i've dun chem and bio, which were really good exams, i'm hoping physics will follow the same trend *prays fervently*... but the hardest one so far for me would be english paper two, especially the 3rd module.

lol. i shouldn't have read this thread. i'm getting all kinds of random songs stuck in my head now. but no, the WORST song to have stuck in your head is "Ding Dong the witch is dead", from the Wizard of Oz movie. srsly, i have it in my head for EVERY exam, and it dun even make sense. i haven't...

twas a good exam. actually, very good. only a few unusual things, eg. multiple choice questions that u had to think about, and also, i didn't like the seven marker in "shipwrecks"...it was a bit wierd. but overall, great paper.

actually, no i'm pretty sure the question asked for how widespread the locust infestation was.

i don't like doing this kind of thing..gets my hopes up. but i think, without exageration [is that how u spell that? hmm it dusn't look right.] anyways, i think raw marks...between 83-88, varies depending on certain questions, eg. locusts and colour blindness and mangroves.

lol. this is more like a "wat'd you say for the coulour-blindness question" thread, than anything to do with the media/BOS officials :P

there is already a thread on this. try: http://community.boredofstudies.org/showthread.php?t=90528

can i just say, i don't feel that we would actually stand a chance of gaining anything by complaining, because, although it is not technically in the syllabus, i have a sinking feeling that BOS will say that it is, because we are expected to "outline" the two models for evolution, and they may...

hahah so the "he" u were referring to would be......me? just lettin u kno, i'm female. lol. [off topic here, but dus my name sound like a guys?]

umm who are you sayin is right?

ok, have to disagree with you there. the question said to compare two MODELS, not two THEORIES. they are two different syllabus points. One is, as you said, about Leakey, Johanson etc and the other deals with the out of africa/regional continuity models. this question, i am fairly sure related...

i din get one. i guess that means i'm screwed? cos, they send all of them out on the same day, rite?