MedVision ad

Search results

  1. N

    Was Text 3, Section 1 a Dog or Human??

    Re: The Poem Was About A Dog? i was referring to "a factor" in the text that we used.... there was some explanation of it in the text
  2. N

    Was Text 3, Section 1 a Dog or Human??

    Re: The Poem Was About A Dog? no but i know how the hsc is marked because my teachers mark it, this is what we were told before and after the exam.... if you didn't say it was a dog then it shouldnt affect you anyway, but like i said it's just 3 marks
  3. N

    Was Text 3, Section 1 a Dog or Human??

    Re: The Poem Was About A Dog? nah it was a general statement lol may-cat beat me to it
  4. N

    Was Text 3, Section 1 a Dog or Human??

    Re: The Poem Was About A Dog? share my view on the marking thing? it's not really my view, it's just how it's done... as soon as you say dog you're already in the mediocore pile (for that question). it's the sad fact of the hsc,
  5. N

    How much did you write for section 1?

    you must have really small handwriting
  6. N

    Was Text 3, Section 1 a Dog or Human??

    Re: The Poem Was About A Dog? if you didn't know what an extended metaphor was then i would question what you've been doing in school for the past 6 years tom.... case in point - in our half yearlies we were asked what the "a factor" was, and everyone that interpreted it wrong did not get full...
  7. N

    Turning pints of WW1

    no there are two turning points as per the syllabus stick to it, don't invent your own turning points
  8. N

    Attention Legal Students!!

    look at the other thread!!!!!! several of us set out the requirements for answering an effectiveness question
  9. N

    Was Text 3, Section 1 a Dog or Human??

    Re: The Poem Was About A Dog? yeah but this is the hsc, if you couldnt pick up that that there was no dog, then the marker is going to think you're an idiot. sure you could support it with with quotes, but obviously if you are not interpreting it properly you won't get full marks in the end it...
  10. N

    Was Text 3, Section 1 a Dog or Human??

    Re: The Poem Was About A Dog? nah if you thought it was a dog you clearly didn't read the poem properly, so no full marks
  11. N

    Was it ok if u disagreed with section 3's statement?

    didn't your english teacher ever tell you that you never disagree/never criticise a text?? if it's included in the exam it means that it's a "fantastic" text/question, so you just set about proving how fantastic it is
  12. N

    Was Text 3, Section 1 a Dog or Human??

    Re: The Poem Was About A Dog? by good marks i mean full marks
  13. N

    1 related material or 2

    agreed with Garygaz if you didn't answer the question expect B range at best
  14. N

    Was Text 3, Section 1 a Dog or Human??

    Re: The Poem Was About A Dog? bit rich coming from someone calling everyone "retarted" but yes, if you thought it was a dog and you wrote that it was about a dog don't expect good marks for that question
  15. N

    Was Text 3, Section 1 a Dog or Human??

    Re: The Poem Was About A Dog? LOL epic fail
  16. N

    Imaginary vs Imaginative

    imaginary journary connotates fake imaginative implies in the imagination big difference, if its continuously used you will definitely lose marks should have read the syllabus
  17. N

    Attention Legal Students!!

    look at other threads http://community.boredofstudies.org/showthread.php?t=184029
  18. N

    Baulko?

    if by try hard gangsters you mean try hard nerds then you're right baulko's as tame as they come, our grade was the last of the worst after us it's going to be even more of an asianville
Top