I used the table to find the total value of the first 20 days and add it to the next 10 (or 11?) days to get a total. Then i think i went to far by trying to turn it to a present value. I should get some working marks though.
I never finished the weird exponential one because i had no clue what it was asking and i got Simon's IQ wrong. I think i should still be able to get in the 90's but that exam was way harder then any of the practice exams I have done.
I personally put extra time towards the crime question so i can get 3 paragraphs on it. For options i normally get 3-4 depending on time and paragraph length. I think 2 in crime would be fine if they have good arguments, evidence and length.
I only have one argument for defenses which is on provocation and the introduction of the crimes amendment(provocation) act 2014. If we get a specific question on it i will die
I personally did visual techniques as well i don't think it will be a problem. Also with 100+ kids some of them are bound to have gone well and with your rank it probably wont be an issue.
I'm memorizing scaffolds for paragraphs, i have about 5 or more for each of the crime sections but that will all fall apart if we get a specific dot point type question. Unless its punishment, that one would be decent.
Well last year was super narrow only focusing on the one dot-point so i wouldn't be surprised for them to do S&P but a much broader question. That would actually be pretty good since there is plenty in that section.