Search results

try turning that into a question: how does the law respond to the needs...?? and asess whether the responses actualy help achieve the needs

lol well the most obvious one is the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948 then there is a whole heap of geneva conventions go to the UN site - they would have heaps

yeah it kind of refers to the fact that nations prior to this pact would go to war to solve issues that we now solve diplomatically, but having signed this pact they ensure that they will cease to use war as an instrument to pursue their selfish goals. The reason it does not apply to war in self...

heeeeeeeey heeeeeeeey yeah, you're right

has anyone looked at the exemplar essays and thought: these are so sh*t?!!! Seems as tho you just have to know the basics to get band 5-6! I was pleasantly surprised to say the least...any thoughts on this?

b but since its the 1999 paper - its the old sylabus so dont worry about it, the legal syllabus has changed quite a bit.

for the role of international tribunals, there really isnt anything else in our syllabus other than the ICJ and the ICC and their ad hocs - and you would never get this as an essay just on its own, it's too brief! and for the role of aust federal structure bla blah, you need to outline...

apartheid in south africa btw unless u talk about something like child sex labour ur screwed if they ask ya for a 'recent' human rights issue if u just talk about slavery asylum seekers is also great, heaps of media stuff on it too

gggrrr for all those currently enrolled at usyd: i hate yas. You could say I 'fell in love' with the campus, i reeeeeeeaaaaallly want to go there it seems like such a blast. Bring on the exams already! I want these next 6 weeks to fly