Search results

Re: 2013 Australian Federal election That does not how a logical conclusion make

what is the justification for your "ergo"

based on what

jesus christ this is A grade crazy shine on you crazy diamond

Are you serious?

I don't agree with you about townie and for the time being I'm giving Lentern the benefit of the doubt

You used to believe in a humanitarian approach to asylum seekers and refugees, but since ol mate Kevvo decided to lock them up on Manus (rape) island, you no longer consider this a problem? I thought you were against the Labor position lurching to the right on this issue? Would you not consider...

What on earth is your point?

You can't be serious.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/21/bradley-manning-sentenced_n_3787492.html This is a dark day for a great man.

hahahha fuck only needed to read 'infowars'

Not at all. Marriage existed before Christianity and exists outside of Christianity (the most glaring examples being atheists, Jews and Muslims). Forcing an institution to be inclusive isn't discriminatory, no. But it isn't correct either. Churches shouldn't have to marry anyone they don't want...

I wasn't being naive. Would you not take offence to being called deformed because someone thought you didn't fit what they considered normal? It means they won't have their gender recorded at birth as decided by their parents. It will be left blank and then filled in or changed at the...

They're probably more uncomfortable being referred to as deformed especially when it mentions in the article that:

Welfare is derived from taxation which, on the most part, is taken from individuals and businesses income. You can just as well argue in this incredibly limited scope that by not taxing people as much, or at all, that same money would be spent or reinvested elsewhere. This is not a good argument...

It doesn't conflict with your beliefs to have same sex marriage exist as long as it doesn't occur within your faith's churches or practices. Having the state recognise a homosexual couple in marriage doesn't mean anything about the religious practice of marriage unless that marriage is...

Do you mean in its entirety or specific sectors of the public service that exists now? If you mean the former, I'm not aware of any such society existing, but I think it might have at some point. It does ring a bell. If you mean the latter, I can't think of any real situation to really say...

It's been far too long

I agree with the clothing and I agree with the gendered tone of the word "bitch" and how it's used against women. However, just for clarification, are you saying that no other politician has ever been met with contempt, slander or insult?

this entire fucking thread