Search results

Gross invasion of privacy.

If you're going to pay good money for new car, wouldn't you get one with a higher safety rating as possible? Hondas are notoriously shit, comparatively unsafe, ugly cars, especially for a Japanese brand. Liking of quality != brand snobbery, dude. My 1998 Saab 9-3 S 5-speed manual has a 2.3L...

Re: do you believe in god? Hemand; does this refer to the Abrahamic God/s or any god? You should probably change the topic title to reflect that.

How are any of these cars "chicks'" cars? What defines a "chick car"? Agreed about the Honda Jazz though. Ugh.

It's an ugly POS with only a 4-star NCAP safety rating.

It looks and performs better, but that Beamer has 134k on it, remember.

The fact that it's a Ford, and thus the build quality is so shit it's not worth the money for a better engine. An engine does not a car make.

Ford Fiesta? Yuck. Stay as far away from Fords or Holdens as possible.

Well maybe not so much the BMW, but certainly with the Celica (seriously uncool) and the RX8, you won't be able to drive them like they're supposed to be driven if you can't drive in manual. Also, shit fuel consumption. Get a Golf.

Hatchbacks are eminently useful and very sexy. Then again, I was raised with Saab hatches and I have one myself, so I may be biased. And if you can't drive manual, there is no point in getting any of the cars you listed. At all. Get a Golf.

These.

1. Hatchbacks are awesome. What's your problem? 2. You don't drive a manual? 3. Lol, I'll pay that.

They're quick? And? There's cars out there that are quicker, cooler, better made and much cheaper.

Mini Cooper? Are you serious? They're POS, and way too expensive for what it is.

:(

Well I am a monarchist *blush*

<3<3

It also takes into account the filesize of the image, remember.

I didn't fake mine, but they didn't give it more than a cursory glance.

Beamer. Or the RX8; family friend has one and he loves the thing. Shit fuel consumption though.