Search results

Nice LATEX, PDF and Word copies of my notes should be finished, just missing some bits in Chemical Monitoring and Management. Free sample of notes, comes with Word/PDF plus nice LATEX PDF sample too (included in zip and attached separately as well)! attached at end Free word copies (no...

was never given them sorry. so pretty sure you won't find them on the web.

pro tip: best to have a discussion in person. I am busy with exams, so that is all you will get. PM any specific questions, probably won't have time to answer; within reason. (no texas sharp-shooters). But it will get me thinking at least. ~dan964

again a sketch for time reasons: 1. No I don't reject Old Testament. Strawman/misleading. 2. Mention of instances does not equal condoning. Specific examples I can address over PM (rather than have a massive mess as before). e.g. Genesis 38 mentions incest for instance, doesn't condone it...

Addressing #3 (part of #4 is addressed here) again a sketch. Maybe I'll come back and address... 1. Ultimate purpose of creation (Ephesians 1:10) is to unite all people under Jesus. Creation is made for him. Jesus is always part of God's plan. That is all the information we are given (not...

1. Can you provide a link to the 500 documented independent eyewitness accounts? Summary of argument/answer: Not required to prove/verify claim. Clarification: My original claim was itself a sketch " Independent eyewitness accounts of the account, including 500 individuals --> this disproves...

I will address #2 first. There is one simple reason why anyone would reject the readings of AIG or any one else. The method Christians use to study a text, is called exegesis. Rather than imported our ideas into the text, we try to study and see what the text is saying for what the author...

No offense, but (4) is a strawman, (1) is misleading, re (2) addressing particular sites, I may not address that particular question, mainly because you have to interact with what is here. We have addressed (3) at length and so I will try to present a summary instead.

we will give him the benefit of the doubt...

boredofsatan, just 2 friendly reminders... 1. It may be helpful for you to demonstrate what you understand in terms of the concepts, maybe show working or attempts on the question. This is to give other users assurance/evidence, that they are not just for instance doing your homework etc. for...

used to play trombone./

I think it is the wrong perspective to have. Don't worry about what could have been. Your atar would be none the less the better, provided you do well, which if 4 unit is an aspiration, then getting a good mark in 2u & 3u should be not an issue.

compare the pair 2 lots of water: 2H_2O or 2\,H_2O vs. 1 lot of heavy water: ^2H_2O the problem is with Google. (Google does not do superscripts or subscripts) if you look at the wikipedia article the 2 is superscripted. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_water

It has to do with the electronegativity. H2O is more very much more stable than H2O2. Putting H2O2 into the sun decomposes it H2O and O2 (very little energy required Also H2O2 is bleech, not heavy water.

for the first question, yes. You can be asked on cellulose so you need to know that it is beta-glucose. (Starch less important but worth knowing anyways)

Temp link during site access so you can still practice for the exam on Monday: https://thsconline.github.io/s/economics_trials.html

he is bragging about it on Facebook.

Worst case scenario: 33.65 Best case scenario: 47.70 Unfortunately there isn't much good news for you based on the information given. A good cohort may raise your internal marks (estimate on trials), but only by so much. You really could end up with anything, it will depend on your HSC...

Re: HSC 2018 MX2 Marathon Prove by Induction that \overline{z_1+z_2+\dots + z_n} = \overline{z}_1 +\overline{z}_2 + \dots \overline{z}_n is this the question?

rankings do not affect HSC mark. ATAR takes final mark.