Search results

Sadly, that is more often than not an oxymoron. Iron excused :o

Why would that be surprising? It's marketed to a female audience.

If someone complains about it, I will remove it, unless I deem it harmless. :)

Because many people have an objection to it being used in a derogatory fashion, including myself?

Hence the inclusion of Safebet, I guess.

Did.. you just have a brainfart?

Well, that's a given.

Yeah. Small fry.

You, small fry?

Aye - if it fails in legislation, he might try to implement it in regulation instead.

I.. know. :p

Macbook.

Would have been. Either way, it doesn't appear to have been blocked, though it's on the blacklist.

The blacklist was only on wikileaks, which appears to be down worldwide. I have a link to the article on wikileaks, however, for when it is resurrected.

It's unavailable in the US at the moment as well, so I wouldn't necessarily correlate it with the publishing of the list.

There have been objections to the sweetners used to sweeten "diet" soft drinks (Phenylalanine is one, I think).

Well, genetic difference increases physical attraction, but it doesn't necessarily make you more likely to orgasm (if so, please provide sources, I'd be interested to read it).

I don't think it's really anything to do with my partner - I have never ever had an orgasm, whether it has been with myself via masturbation or with anyone else. I do have some sort of a plateau that I reach, in that I get a peaking of pleasure followed by oversensitivity, but it isn't an orgasm...

It can have physical or psychiatric causes, but for women like me there's no apparent cause at all. I don't have any apparent medical or psychological issues preventing it; maybe there's just some mind/body disconnect. Who knows. :(

Yeah. I love sex. Both the emotional closeness - more "making love" - and the physical sensation. Also, sunsettah - doggy on the loungeroom floor? Totally jealous.