Search results

End of the day, its not up for us to decide the correct answers haha. Whatever BOS says goes.

CRIMES ACT 1900 - SECT 345 Principals in the second degree-how tried and punished 345 Principals in the second degree-how tried and punished "Every principal in the second degree in any serious indictable offence shall be liable to the same punishment to which the person would have been liable...

You are forgiven. Yeah I looked at that website too. How annoying is the music. Another point is the wording of the question is "Which of the following best describes what Dale committed?" and if you look at the stimulus - "18 year old Alex and 19 year old Dale planned to rob a bank" and then...

Did you just contradict yourself? You said robbery only, then stated conspiracy and robbery. I've stated this in the exam discussion thread, but I'll post again here. Well, I was looking at http://criminal.findlaw.com/crimes/a-z/conspiracy.html. And it states 'One person may be charged...

Just because freedom of religion is a civil and political right, does not make it not a 'human right'. Otherwise the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights would not be considered International Humanitarian Law or even appear in the Human Rights topic. Also it is stated explicitly...

Well, I was looking at http://criminal.findlaw.com/crimes/a-z/conspiracy.html. And it states 'One person may be charged with and convicted of both conspiracy and the underlying crime based on the same circumstances.' Someone also said that conspiracy was a 'preliminary' offence. I think this...

My understanding was that when the Australian Government has 'ratified' a treaty, they have already incorporated it into domestic law. Therefore it doesn't enable them to enact legislation because it already has been done. Thus, it criminalises breaches of the human rights that are inclusive in...

A collaboration of what I got and what my teacher told me: 1) D 2) B 3) A 4) C 5) A (However I thought it was ambiguous because it said Shane was 'waiting' implied he knew so might possibly be B) 6) B 7) B (My teacher said D, but I think because they planned the bank robbery, it is conspiracy...

What was your essay structure?

Yes, sorry I just looked.

Pretty sure; 6 marker = Sources D and E and 10 marker = Source C and D

I hope you didn't write your response like this

He was the First Architect of the Third Reich before he was Armaments Minster. I did - Joining Nazi Party - Armaments Minister - Nuremberg Trials What'd people write for his contribution? I did; - Architecture - War effort - Nuremberg Controversy - Release of Books

What was the answer for 4? about the aeroplanes and cavalry.

What did people write for " There is a non-infectious disease among patients in aged-care home. Outline how features of an epidemiological study can determine the cause of this disease "? By features did it mean requirements that make an epidemiological study valid? eg control group, period of...

Isn't it that by removing the nucleic acid - specifically RNA - the virus is unable to perform reverse transcription which enables viruses to cause a cell to become viral?

good thanks

As far as I understood it, Natural Killer T cell was a type of cytotoxic cell which killed abnormal host cells specifically. I do believe some people might use them interchangeably but I think its possible there is a distinct difference.

good thanks

In actual fact, you are wrong. The fossil record being incomplete provides no evidence at all, and if you read your textbook correctly you'd see that there is fossil evidence to prove punctuated equilibrium. The horseshoe crabs if you'd like an example. The fact that the fossil record is...