Search results

which topic r u focusing on where there's no law reform?

similar format with defining but it depends if the q asks abt ctp or cjs or whatever. if it was ctp id say something like: **1st sentence = to what extent statement/answer question directly. due to its increased focus on judicial discretion and the rights of the alleged offender rather than on...

Be as cohesive as possible with your argument! Say things that distinguish u from the rest. Eg: u say something is somewhat effective, u need to also say “had (whatever topic or court or agency) implemented this specific strategy (name what is it, like whatever consumer marketing strategy etc...

anything is possible tbh, but still worth going over bc u can always use that info in a HR 7 marker

yes one hundred percent! also mentioning police powers here would be great

all good bby u got this!

if the question is on youth offenders? id steer away from using the same case but u could try to put the argument of age + children's court in one para

generally theyd specify if they want international, if they say just courts then assume domestic, which includes youth koori + drug court : )

yep that's okay too! ppl have gotten 15/15 with 2 paras, u got thisss

ur gonna walk in there with a fat headache, half asleep, nauseous asf.

for the crime essay, before going in i aimed for 3-4 paragraphs, stick with a minimum of 3! these paragraphs are just 3 topics. u can use a lot of evidence within these paragraphs but if u have too many topics and concepts then the reader finds it hard to follow what ur talking abt, u lose sight...

honestly they've been predicting credit for like the past 5 yrs but nothing, still worth going over. also im not sure if uve already been told but plsss define as much as u can. literally define what a consumer is, whats a business, what is credit, whats debt, these marks are easy marks!! this...

nooo its okay u still have a couple of hrs, ur gonna regret pulling an all nighter

just looked at my paper: i also talked about CTP with charge negotiations --> not only encourages cooperation bw offender and court but also reduces amt of resources spent on court procedures by reducing likelihood of prolonging the case, example is R v. Taiseni. but counter argument is that...

i bought my paper back so ill try to find it and send it but im pretty sure i talked about judicial discretion in courts thru mitigating factors that encourages the offender to comply with the police/judicial personnel (kinda like if u cooperate ill try to take into account ur circumstances)...

same criteria for options : ) at least for me i kept it the sm

OMG CONGRATS GUYS UR ALL DONE!!! 💗💗💗

Yall spam the nesa mcq questions for HR and crime I promise ull be fine 😭

my recommendation is to define all the terms of the question first so u tick off the low band marks straightaway. like if a question asks abt the effect of empiricism u wouldn't just jump right into it, ud define it and outline its origins. also include as many examples as u can! even if they're...