Search results

why not sorry the source of the water that we made dirt into mud was oxygen rich but somehow it lost the oxygen on the way in.very logical Face it natural creation of life is impossible!, its simply not going to happen

Quote: Originally Posted by Tistime345 uh do you see how you guys are fighting tw separate arguments, sometimes john says that it hapened in shallow surface pools and then other times you go into your deep ocean vent theory, btw, how was ammonia meant to get into the reacton site before...

kwayera your such a dope, are you telling me then that the anaerobic bacteria that formed in the ocean, somehow got into the mud and survived there, didnt you know that at those levels the ocean has close to 100ppm of oxygen , the fact that the dirt is mud suggests water is in it, i.e. the same...

uh do you see how you guys are fighting tw separate arguments, sometimes john says that it hapened in shallow surface pools and then other times you go into your deep ocean vent theory, btw, how was ammonia meant to get into the reacton site before forming ammonium, ill give you a hint, it cant...

OH WOW LMAO. Yes, there was/is oxygen in the deep ocean. I'm not talking about the anoxic abyssal trenches - and you do realise that the first known forms of life were anaerobic bacteria. wow dopey bitch and how did they survive in your oxygen rich deep ocean And john, i dont get it...

nikolas i was talking to john oliver, not you, so yeah zimmerman -- All theories that don't involve a god must adhere to established scientific fact. Once you introduce a god into the equation, you can come up with whatever crazy explanation you feel like for everything. There can...

wait a sec Kwayera, the whole point of the argument would be to place the elements out of rabnge of oxygen, so what are you saying; that you'd place the site of the creation of life in this place. And heres why Kwayera should never pass uni, Here's a little secret: he's in third year...

ooh, third year uni, im terrified, so your views now conflict, one is required for the correct elements to be present, i.e the asteroid, the other is required for the oxygen to be present, i.e. deep ocean. Here i'll give you both a hint, they conflict because it never really happened

kwayera read your allies post, john oliver, If diluted throughout early Earth's ocean, it probably wouldn't do much to stimulate the emergence of life. deep ocean theory =dumb bitch, + hows lightning meant to get down to the deep ocean And john oliver, mr genius, your quoting that...

And the little bitch, the one who got no friends John Oliver, when was my physics ever refuted cunt, care to argue, when did i admit that in this post or was the senior stuff just too hard to really get. Get the fuk off to bed you little fuk, before your parents belt teh shit out of you. In...

Please, enlighten us with you uni grade knowledge

whats wrong with the middle part of my response Kwayera

Hey John Oliver, what yr 8, yh explains why your argument is shit, personally cant stand em (yr 8's), what, an asteroid would substantially increase the probability that amino acids forming? 1. who cares, the gases present dont add up in reality, (e.g plentiful supplies of oxygen must have...

Lukybear, first are you catholic or christian; and if so which christian, secondly i admit not to have time or energy to go thorugh the entire link but from what your saying it brings us back to the beginning, that we cant really be sure; but that atheists often resort to illogical aguments for...

btw i know my spelling sucks something awful in these posts, yh its been going downhill since english HSC. Just reaffirming this, atheists are really, really, smart.

nikolas i was shooting off on a side issue, its shooting off on a side issue, to be honest it doesnt effect me if you believe it or not. Kwayera, rational people, scientists and atheists and whatnot, yh im rational to beieve that soemting came from nothing, im rational enough to believe that...

Lukybear is the exact definition of what i was talking about kwayera, But just to clarify, the Law of Conservation of Matter breaks down at Singularity, thus disproving your statement. sorry do you care to prove that, do you care to prove to me that that actually happened, did you ever...

nikolas this was originally intended for cyanide but i suggest you have a look into it yourself befroe you plaec yourself into being an agnostic forever Where you say that your argument is that its impossible to know if god exists or not, then that will come in the second part of any debate...

nik what are you saying by the 'something'what, some mysterious force in the universe, or what, and kwayera i admitted to your first response but what is the seocnd suppost to mean, i was saying thats what the god believers would say, are you saying we as in me and you are on the same side...

For Kwayera, i guess i should phrase myself a bit more precisely, by the first part ive seen atheists shoot off the old argument, maybe the laws of physics change, when trying to describe things that shouldnt be the way they are, whilst in other times they point to scienific theories based upon...