Search results

From what I heard about ACORN a) It's likely to be bottom-up fraud that the organisation its self does not support i.e. because they send people out to canvas who need to meet quotas etc b) All of the fraud's probably going to be picked up anyway.

who will monitor the monitors?

hey jezzmo, we should hang out again sometime.

You really think so? That's a fairly extreme ideology you've got there, by the sounds of things. I mean, I'm sure Marx definitely would have accepted it's better to live in a capitalist society than to die.

BEAUTIFUL ANSWERS SO FAR : )

FUCK YEAH WOO!!!!!!!

i hear lesbos are pretty fucking hawt hahahahhaarrrrr

just wonderin. Would like to see some of your responses. :o :o :o :o :o :o :o

My question is more what makes their altering (based on a dream or whatever) any sillier than how their theology was originally formed? The content may be crappier, but then again it might be better too. How does reinterpretation make them any more dangerous than staying, as much as any text...

I'm not trying to persuade anyone atm. I'm just wondering how you would reconcile your flippant dismissal of catholics listening to the pope's "divinely inspired" theological musings with acceptance of those of anyone else (including Jesus)? Are the catholics particularly silly or am I just...

What are we left with once we remove the possibility of divine inspiration? Doesn't that somewhat invalidate some of the claims of Jesus?

Hey me too! (well, i was like... 8) Was it as scary for you? :)

Have either of you done any classes on information theory? Out of curiosity, because whenever I read an online debate about the 'increase of information' it usually ends requiring the biologist to try to explain what 'information' means in a non-everyday sense.

It's all looney. Nothing loonier about saying the Pope can have a dream and be touched by the divinity of Christ now than saying 2000 years ago X was touched in a similar way by God to write Y.

The whole 'works in theory' thing, which I hear and have seen in this thread way too often, you really have to blame Homer Simpson for. It seems the Simpsons have done more to establish the idea for this generation that communism is a flawed theory than any historical account.

Neithers opinions are really all that important... I don't offer up my own opinions as evidence on such matters - I stand on the shoulders of giants.

Thanks, next week I present my justification for slavery (HINT: It's super racist)

mate, they're not just 13 year old boys, alright?

Although, I must admit the first debate they had... I'd actually put it closer to a tie, both conceptually and stylistically. Which is funny because, at least the media, has been trumping up how good mccain is at 'town hall style' debates :/

I want to support mccain, but i truly just don't see that he won that debate either in style or substance..