Search results

Oh ok no worries. Although the "alligning" does it change dramatically year by year or is it constant throughout every year? Curiosity.

Epic on Topic Post is Epic.

uh.... If u didn't turn up u would get a "Non-Serious Attempt" or a "Non-Attempt" which means a Automatic 0. For SITTING the exam you are expected to pass because of the leniency of the marking and alignment from what i have gathered. Don't talk without thinking, Stupid Reject.

Cem, Thanks for replying first of all but all the examples u gave if u divided that "raw" mark by 2 and added 50 it resulted in the mark u said it MAY be alligned to :P.

Oh i see although if the sticky isn't right i think it should be taken down seeing as its giving false information or maybe i just misread it. Thanks though, More replies and information is welcome.

Then how are the marks scaled because in the trials ALOT of people i know got below 50% and these aren't the typical stupid shits that walk around it would be odd to see them get band 1's..

Then whats all this dividing your "raw" mark by 2 and adding 50 to it? That cem was saying.

Obviously ill try my best and get a satisfactory mark i was just wondering if that was true, and if it wasn't why is it stickied? Edit: "arent SC marks not in 1/2s, 1/4s etc.?", They aren't but if say you got 72.8 it would be logical to be pushed up to 73.

http://community.boredofstudies.org/129/year-10-school-certificate/159244/sc-marking-results-process.html Thats where i read the "raw" mark being divided by 2 and 50 added to it, although i have heard they changed it to 40 instead of 50. Is this true?

Holy @%!&, you got some issues girl.

Hi, Ive read on the sticky that they half your "raw" mark and add 50 to it although that post was posted on 2006 so marking or whatever may have changed and can anyone explain? Thanks.