03'ers.. how far off was SAM for your UAI (1 Viewer)

[freaking_out]

+0.55

 

[scandal]

prediction was off by -0.05

 

[Beaky]

Originally posted by honky tonk
I had that too.. only 2 of 5 scaled positively: Biology and Software Design and Development.

Ironically my highest mark was the only subject that had negative scaling

 

[+Po1ntDeXt3r+]

+0.15 diff

 

[Fosweb]

0.1 above.

1 more mark in english and i would have got 99...

 

[glitter burns]

.15 less than what I got.

 

[simmmo]

.4 above

 

[pigs_can_fly]

-0.05 quite impressive methinks

 

[Carlito]

SAM was above by 0.05

 

[Ashleet]

mine was .25 over

 

[fringey]

SAM was below by .20 well done that is amazing. I just wish I did the HSC in 2001 or 2002 they are higher!!

 

[ND]

SAM - 0.15 = My UAI.

 

[*10#]

- 0.15

our year is so much smarter than 01 + 02 !!!!!!!!

SAM is so cool u 04 ppl r spoilt

 

[hk31]

-0.05

 

[Dash]

0.4 too high...

 

[...]

Originally posted by pigs_can_fly
-0.05 quite impressive methinks

oh i can imagine ur dissapointment




haha...

 

[Rahul]

it was .2 higher

 

[s2ophie]

0.1 lower

 

[cheesegrater]

2003 -1.6
overall + .7
i did one subject accelerated does this affect accuracy? (accounted for this in that drop down thing), also does accuracy decrease as UAI goes down because i got a low UAI (79.2) and its less accurate than others?

 

[Jealousy]

Mine was .15 to low, not happy jan!! By the sounds of it these ppl who made SAM can't get anyones right! Ridiculous!