well done Tash. thats rightstill waiting said:tort is a civil wrong ie something done to the public by a large company or the council etc
property covers any misuse/damage to items owned by someone
and contract is a breach of an agreement between two people either verbal or non verbal.....
i think thats what it is anyways, oh wise one reveal your answers......
natural justice, or procedural fairness, gives people the right to be heard and decisions made regarding their future without bias. Byrne v Australian Airlines (1994) is an example of where natural justice was denied in term of dismissal without being allowed to put forward an argument to his employer. in essence the doctrine can be defined as the rules of 'fairplay'.goan_crazy said:the rule of law refers to the idea that the law should be known by all, applied equally in all situations, does not discriminate etc
next
explain natural justice
the rule of law refers to the idea that the law should be known by all, applied equally in all situations, does not discriminate etcmelsc said:c
Explain the rule of law
v trippyroadcone said:natural justice, or procedural fairness, gives people the right to be heard and decisions made regarding their future without bias. Byrne v Australian Airlines (1994) is an example of where natural justice was denied in term of dismissal without being allowed to put forward an argument to his employer. in essence the doctrine can be defined as the rules of 'fairplay'.
what are the main influences on the law?
this site is so trippy these days
yeah it results in some abstract interpretation being needed on some days..goan_crazy said:v trippy
my posts r all out of order and appear above the replier
anyway
influences on law-there are 5
social influences
cultural influences
moral influences
political influences
economic influences
next question: what is natural law? [ppl get this 1 confused w natural justice...]
goan_crazy said:yeah basically natural law developed from higher power or reasonings... It is said to have come from "the gods"
anyway in response to your question:
collective human rights are those HRs which apply to a group of people such as the collective right to self determination and individual rights are those that apply to individuals of a nation state e.g. the right to work, the right to a fair trial
next question: What is the difference between civil and political rights and economic social and cultural rights?
yeah basically natural law developed from higher power or reasonings... It is said to have come from "the gods"roadcone said:yeah it results in some abstract interpretation being needed on some days..
umm natural law (i think) is where govts are answerable to a higher authority. that is the concept that citizens can complain above their national govt, to the UN for example. natural law provided the first protection of human rights.
02 Independent a) Outline what is meant by the notion of individual and collective HR.
yeap and roadcone, heres another thing 4 those...roadcone said:CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS: - rights which protect the individual from the extreme exercising of power by the state. examples are free speech, fair trial, freedom from slavery
ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS: - rights that oblige the govt to become more involved in citizens rights in order to achive a better daily life. examples are right to education, equal pay for equal work, health
Name the four ways in which HR can be enforced internationally.
International: Human Rights Crisis in Zimbabwelil mon said:State Sovereignity is the right of a nation state to make their own laws and govern their countries without interference from other nation states. A disadvatage of this is that human rights can be ignored because the state has more power than the individual.
As a recent fan of this thread, i shall point out that this question has been asked atleast 3 times...... and no i dont have a tally going.
okies next question: name two cases that deal with a breach of human rights, one domestic and one international.
Prin. in the first degree - Person who committed the crimeairbag said:International: Human Rights Crisis in Zimbabwe
The Mugabe regime has contravened the UNDHR in no less than 19 places, an example of which being the contravention of article 5 (no one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment)
Domestic: Treatment of asylum seekers (i haven't really studied this in depth yet)
QUESTION: Define the term "parties to a crime"?
For: will regulate and standardise human rights, making them domestically enforceable which they are not under international law.historykidd said:QUESTION: Outline for and against argument for the possiblity of a bill of rights
umm...Hexamarillion said:QUESTION: What are possible outcomes in successful civil and criminal court cases?
Well, I may be wrong, but i think equity is an old, old wooden ship from the Civil war era...=)lisa said:umm...
civil - Plaintiff proves on the balance of probabilities that Mr X was in the wrong, therefore wins a compensation pay out (or something) for his client.
criminal - serial killer gets life in prison. safety for society!!!
my question:::: what are the principles of equity? what is equity? (lol, seriously, i dont know)