am i cursed cus my school uses maths in focus (1 Viewer)

maxxxxx

New Member
Joined
May 3, 2024
Messages
18
Gender
Male
HSC
2025
i know a lot of selective schools use cambridge and we use fitzpatrick when weve finished topics as revision, but should i just switch to doing cambridge or fitzpatrick? its all the same content with a lot more accurate question hsc-wise and better explanations, but is maths in focus dooming me?
 

Armon

Active Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2022
Messages
141
Gender
Male
HSC
2023
Maths in focus is optimal for 3u to just get through the course as quick as possible and start grinding papers. 4u you want a more solid foundation tho so maths In focus is atar suicide. I’d say either do Cambridge/mastering (read the theory&noted from Cambridge but do the mastering excercises instead of cambridge ones) if you’re gunning for like 95+ 4u mark or if you just want a low e4 Fitzpatrick is the way to go. Fitzpatrick is in depth enough to learn without being as exhausting to work through as Cambridge. except the proof excercises; fitzpatrick got the goofiest proof qs, induction excercise pissed me off so bad.
 

Drongoski

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
4,255
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
i know a lot of selective schools use cambridge and we use fitzpatrick when weve finished topics as revision, but should i just switch to doing cambridge or fitzpatrick? its all the same content with a lot more accurate question hsc-wise and better explanations, but is maths in focus dooming me?
Nothing to stop you from getting your own copies of the Cambridge of Fitzpatrick textbooks; and go thru them yourself.
 

maxxxxx

New Member
Joined
May 3, 2024
Messages
18
Gender
Male
HSC
2025
Maths in focus is optimal for 3u to just get through the course as quick as possible and start grinding papers. 4u you want a more solid foundation tho so maths In focus is atar suicide. I’d say either do Cambridge/mastering (read the theory&noted from Cambridge but do the mastering excercises instead of cambridge ones) if you’re gunning for like 95+ 4u mark or if you just want a low e4 Fitzpatrick is the way to go. Fitzpatrick is in depth enough to learn without being as exhausting to work through as Cambridge. except the proof excercises; fitzpatrick got the goofiest proof qs, induction excercise pissed me off so bad.
u are a lifesaver
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top