American Imperialism - A list of American Imperialism (2 Viewers)

[Nick]

why are you on an internet forum talking about this with us, you need to go put on a spandex suit and save the world from this imperialist menace

 

[George W. Bush]

Originally posted by Comrade nathan
Do you mean the UN needs more power to step in and stop americas motives with force?

Hahaha. Likely. Do you have any idea of the American contribution to UN missions? Even if the UN had its own private force, it would never have the balls to make any sort of meaningful decision - it's destined to go the way of the League of Nations.

Oh, and go out and do anything about it? The free market scourge is keeping him down! Death to Keynes!

 

[Alexander]

Originally posted by euripidies
Just a note on the UN, the UN never had much of a chance for having power seeing one of the major players in its creation was the USA an imperialistic terrorist state.

The UN's predecessor (League of Nations) had NO chance of success BECAUSE the US wasn't appart of it. In fact, on of the Leagues accomplishments was to boot out the USSR for...what was it? oooo that's right, gross humanitarian injustices and expansion of its borders...aka imperialism.
If you cant recall the cold war, the US and USSR were at best equal in hindering UN success. But no, massive soviet support for communist rebels in poor countires wasn't imperialism. The domino theory? what's that?
Your blind spot, my friend, is bigger than your mumma's arse.

 

[neo o]

i think your better off calling it "selective absorption of facts"

 

[euripidies]

If you cant recall the cold war, the US and USSR were at best equal in hindering UN success. But no, massive soviet support for communist rebels in poor countires wasn't imperialism. The domino theory? what's that?
Your blind spot, my friend, is bigger than your mumma's arse.

My blind spot now pity the only time we talked about the USSR we in regards to their imperialism, which wasnt trying to spread communism the USSR had the theory of socialist in one country which was thought up by Stalin not to mention the fact that they werent communist or even socialist but thats right you just dont reply to facts. Sorry unless to attack to person.

Anyways we were talking about the USA, you never seem to adhere to the facts but try and attack the person its rather pathetic

 

[teh winnar!]

ME: I DON'T CARE ABOUT COMMUNAISM - WHEN DO WE GET TEH GUNS!?

LENIN: I TOLD YOU ALREADY- I'M NOT GOING TO GIVE YOU THAR GUN UNTIL YOU TELL ME YOUR NAME

ME: I'VE HAD IT UP TO HERE WITH YOUR RUUULES!

*LINEN CASTS +5 COMMUNISM ON ME

ME: DOWN WITH THAR AFFLUENTS!

 

[euripidies]

teh winnar! nice play on role playing games.

 

[Alexander]

Originally posted by euripidies


My blind spot now pity the only time we talked about the USSR we in regards to their imperialism, which wasnt trying to spread communism the USSR had the theory of socialist in one country which was thought up by Stalin not to mention the fact that they werent communist or even socialist but thats right you just dont reply to facts. Sorry unless to attack to person.

Anyways we were talking about the USA, you never seem to adhere to the facts but try and attack the person its rather pathetic

1. Is that english?
2. It's a fact now that the USSR was neither communist or socialist?
3. "Socialism in one country"...yeah, that one country being the rest of the world after it was aquired by them
4. We were talking about the US's role in the UN, in which you so FACTUALLY said was hindered from any success becausee of the advent of US imperialism...my comment was specifically a reply to this great adhering of the facts.

 

[hatty]

Originally posted by euripidies
if you have read the communist thread you'd know what incentives there are in Marxist economics but seeing you dont care what the labour value theory is and you rather just rip of something you dont understand, I dont think theres much point in responding to someone as ignorant as you other then stropping other people from accepting your rhetoric. Just a note on the UN, the UN never had much of a chance for having power seeing one of the major players in its creation was the USA an imperialistic terrorist state.

LOL

 

[euripidies]

hatty you're a fool.

 

[Alexander]

You haven't met SKA have you euripidies? I think you'd hit it off.

 

[Aerials]

Arabs dont have that luxury...

...oh don't they? The arabs are one of the richest peoples of the world. And anyway wasnt this about Afghanistan? HTF did Arabs get involved with the issue? If it was because of Israel then I withdraw my statement/s because, yes you ARE right, Palestinian Arabs don't have that choice. Heck they don't have very many choices

Its funny though, how you're all sitting in countries which provide you with basically everything and go on condemning these so called "terrorists" who are supposedly making weapons of mass destruction. Whats the difference between the WMD that America makes and the ones that are made by other countries... oh no but wait, its alright if America rains hell on other countries. Its just those "rogue nations" (majority of which are Islamic nations: hint hint) which are seen as a threat.

and just to close off and shut up my babbling, if I did an objective analysis between George W. Bush and a pack of Tic Tacs, the Tic Tacs would come out on top in terms of IQ. FUCK GEORGE W. BUSH AND FUCK HIS ENDLESS SEARCH FOR FRESH OIL WELLS AND HIS CONDESCENDING WAYS.

 

[George W. Bush]

Originally posted by Aerials
Its funny though, how you're all sitting in countries which provide you with basically everything and go on condemning these so called "terrorists" who are supposedly making weapons of mass destruction. Whats the difference between the WMD that America makes and the ones that are made by other countries... oh no but wait, its alright if America rains hell on other countries.

Multiple choice, so you can understand it:
a) America won't use their weapons offensively
b) America won't sell weapons to terrorist organisations, who will use them on civilians given half a chance
c) America can be trusted to have weapons, given their track record
d) All of the above.

Its just those "rogue nations" (majority of which are Islamic nations: hint hint) which are seen as a threat.

I object to your racial implications. Name a non Islamic terrorist organsation which is a) a serious group b) aiming to destroy America. Where do you think ISLAMIC terrorist groups will train, draw their members, funds and supplies from? Maybe, just maybe, ISLAMIC COUNTRIES?

and just to close off and shut up my babbling, if I did an objective analysis between George W. Bush and a pack of Tic Tacs, the Tic Tacs would come out on top in terms of IQ.

George Bush graduated from Yale with a C average, which in those days actually meant you were an average student. That means he's an average student at an IVY LEAGUE SCHOOL, if you know what that is, you ignorant fuck.

FUCK GEORGE W. BUSH AND FUCK HIS ENDLESS SEARCH FOR FRESH OIL WELLS AND HIS CONDESCENDING WAYS.

You are racist.

 

[reno2004]

Originally posted by George W. Bush
Multiple choice, so you can understand it:
a) America won't use their weapons offensively
b) America won't sell weapons to terrorist organisations, who will use them on civilians given half a chance
c) America can be trusted to have weapons, given their track record
d) All of the above.

wat is this crap about giving ppl a chance, too bad 60% of f**ken america is under the poverty line. That is really giving ppl a chance isnt it. Bloody george bush and friends just take from the poor and share it among themselves, all under the name of "looking for the Axis of Evil". Obviously G.W hasent looked in the mirror lately.

Originally posted by George W. Bush

George Bush graduated from Yale with a C average, which in those days actually meant you were an average student. That means he's an average student at an IVY LEAGUE SCHOOL, if you know what that is, you ignorant fuck.

I bet it wouldnt be too hard to get a C average in Yale when ur dad is paying for the schools expenses and ur mum is hiving headies to the school chairman guy.



As for ur previous posts G.W Bush, maybe u would reconsider ur words if u actually went to any other country in the world and found out wat the people were going through. I dont exactly think the Afghan people or the Iraqis or any other country America have "liberated" is any better off now.

 

[George W. Bush]

Originally posted by reno2004
wat is this crap about giving ppl a chance, too bad 60% of f**ken america is under the poverty line. That is really giving ppl a chance isnt it. Bloody george bush and friends just take from the poor and share it among themselves, all under the name of "looking for the Axis of Evil". Obviously G.W hasent looked in the mirror lately.

The text you quoted has absolutely no relevance to what you are saying. Also, 60% of the American population is not under the poverty line. Since you're obviously misinformed, I feel no need to respond to your paranoid rants.

I bet it wouldnt be too hard to get a C average in Yale when ur dad is paying for the schools expenses and ur mum is hiving headies to the school chairman guy.

On what are you basing this? Plenty of people pay fees for university, all over the world, including Sydney. What the fuck are you talking about?

As for ur previous posts G.W Bush, maybe u would reconsider ur words if u actually went to any other country in the world and found out wat the people were going through.

And you obviously know what these people are going through, with the details of your recent trips to Baghdad provided in your post. BTW: The Kurds want to tell you the gas tasted just fine, thanks.

I dont exactly think the Afghan people or the Iraqis or any other country America have "liberated" is any better off now.

And you've obviously an expert on said matters.

I refuse to respond to any additional material you may post if it is of similar quality.

 

[reno2004]

ur heaps cool man, i wish i could be like u

 

[euripidies]

"2. It's a fact now that the USSR was neither communist or socialist?" yes even Lenin said that and Trotsky well he just drilled it in.

"I object to your racial implications. Name a non Islamic terrorist organsation which is a) a serious group b) aiming to destroy America. Where do you think ISLAMIC terrorist groups will train, draw their members, funds and supplies from? Maybe, just maybe, ISLAMIC COUNTRIES?"

i thought Islamic terrorist groups got their founding form the united states lol hahahaha.

"BTW: The Kurds want to tell you the gas tasted just fine, thanks."

Send complements to the chief America. The bottom line is that America put in the bath party into power and latter down the track when Saddam Hussein filed the top spot they also supported him, they used him to fight the Islamic revolution which they started because of their work in Iran. Now the invasion of Kuwait the Americans gave them the green light but then changed there minds. That was just a bit of added information.

On what are you basing this? Plenty of people pay fees for university, all over the world, including Sydney. What the fuck are you talking about?

yer but it doesnt make it right. You know how much harder its going to be for students of my year to get into university now with all the changes. a friend of mine a few years older whent to Sydney uni for what she wanted to do you only had to get 70 uai now the same subject is 90 uai.

wat is this crap about giving ppl a chance, too bad 60% of f**ken america is under the poverty line.

Thats not right but the percentages of people under the poverty line in America the so called greatest economy in the world are still very hight. The last time I looked it up it was 35m people under the poverty line. But you also have to look up the fact that they dont count homeless people well they estimate them.

I bet it wouldnt be too hard to get a C average in Yale when ur dad is paying for the schools expenses and ur mum is hiving headies to the school chairman guy.

That is pretty funny the leader of the worlds lone supper power couldnt even get through school on his on merit.

a) America won't use their weapons offensively
b) America won't sell weapons to terrorist organisations, who will use them on civilians given half a chance
c) America can be trusted to have weapons, given their track record
d) All of the above.

a) well if you thought of the whole world as Americas lands then you could say that.
b) umm, they are a terrorist organisation the very fact that they have so many WMD scares me. They have used WMD on civilians before what happened that ended the Second World War, I wonder.
c) Given their track record, the WW2 they dropped the a-bomb, in Korea they planed to do it again but china signed the peace deal before they did. They you have the examples of Cambodia when they also planed to drop WMD.
d) So all of the above and all we have talked about in past post proves that America cant be trusted.

I object to your racial implications. Name a non Islamic terrorist organsation which is a) a serious group b) aiming to destroy America. Where do you think ISLAMIC terrorist groups will train, draw their members, funds and supplies from? Maybe, just maybe, ISLAMIC COUNTRIES?

I cant really think of any but thats because they only ones they report on are Islamic groups maybe they are racist.

 

[euripidies]

"You haven't met SKA have you euripidies? I think you'd hit it off."

whos SKA?

 

[George W. Bush]

Originally posted by reno2004
ur heaps cool man, i wish i could be like u

Pwned by own ineptitude.

i thought Islamic terrorist groups got their founding form the united states lol hahahaha

You thought wrong, again. You should correct that before it becomes a habit.

Send complements to the chief America.

Yes, America did support Saddam when fighting Iran - this doesn't made America responsible for Saddam gassing the Kurds. Do I have to use my dog analogy again? It's like you buying a dog to protect you, letting it go out on the streets and then a year later, it attacks a homeless guy. No causal link.

yer but it doesnt make it right. You know how much harder its going to be for students of my year to get into university now with all the changes.

He was saying George Bush got through Yale because his father was paying school fees. I said plenty of people pay school fees. If that is proper or not is another issue, but you can't say Bush got special treatment because his Dad paid university fees

That is pretty funny the leader of the worlds lone supper power couldnt even get through school on his on merit.

It might be funny if Mrs. Bush was really giving blowjobs to the school chairman. Unfortunately, I think you'll find that's incorrect, to the best of everyone's knowledge.

a) well if you thought of the whole world as Americas lands then you could say that.

America has used WMDs offensively twice, to end one of the greatest conflicts in human history, and even then they didn't understand the damage the bomb would cause. America has never used them again since. What are you basing your statement on? Do you deny the above facts?

b) umm, they are a terrorist organisation the very fact that they have so many WMD scares me. They have used WMD on civilians before what happened that ended the Second World War, I wonder.

America is a terrorist organisation? Just when I begin to give some credit to the things you say, you start saying something like "Bush is Hitler" or "America is a terrorist organisation".

c) Given their track record, the WW2 they dropped the a-bomb, in Korea they planed to do it again but china signed the peace deal before they did. They you have the examples of Cambodia when they also planed to drop WMD.

FACT: It's never happened since 1945.


Oh, and you REALLY don't want to know who SKA is. I mean, seriously - curiousity killed the cat and all. I'd tell you, but I mean, that's like answering someone when they say "What's bukkake?".

 

[stamos]

Originally posted by euripidies
"You haven't met SKA have you euripidies? I think you'd hit it off."

whos SKA?

bos's village idiot