Yes, Mac is good, if it actually has your topics! My teacher has a very classical focus, making Mac a complete waste of $10 for me *shakes fist* however, i've found excel amazingly fantastic and wonderful... i only wish that they had updated last year to include Pompeii and Herculaneum...charm13 said:i've found so far that macquarie is really good for summaries, especially for agrippina
Hmm... Are you sure you haven't just figured out how a library catalogue works? [edit: sorry, I thought you were talking about the *library*, not the study guide]antisheep said:Yes, Mac is good, if it actually has your topics! My teacher has a very classical focus, making Mac a complete waste of $10 for me *shakes fist*.
Excel is good if you're finding it really difficult to grasp the basics, I guess, but there are much better summarised books...however, i've found excel amazingly fantastic and wonderful... i only wish that they had updated last year to include Pompeii and Herculaneum..
I've tried or read almost all of them, didn't really see a big difference, stick with what you have.ahohen_77 said:Can someone give me a general idea about which textbook is best used for ancient history?
Its not that bad, and I can see why they took out the various overlapping societies and grouped them into the single one.Koray said:Pompei and Herculaneum is the biggest load of bullshit and is shit boring.