• Best of luck to the class of 2025 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here

Answer to 10b? (1 Viewer)

jtyler

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2007
Messages
61
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
I should not have made a common denominator in part i, haha crap it would've been so much easier. I have been a fool.
You have no idea how retarded I feel... I found a common denominator once I'd differentiated (mindlessly), and the resultant expression was impossible to solve. The entire time I was staring at it (and it was a long time believe me, I found the previous 9 questions VERY easy, even compared to previous HSC's), the thought of cross multiplying didn't cross my mind once.

I feel so stupid.
 

ando24

New Member
Joined
May 8, 2007
Messages
3
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
i got to the differentation of it to find the minimum and then simplified it for 2 pages of working only to get stuck.....
 

Fish Sauce

Active Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
1,051
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
ando24 said:
i got to the differentation of it to find the minimum and then simplified it for 2 pages of working only to get stuck.....
I did about a page of simplifying then noticed a tiny mistake further up the page so I just gave up and went back to do questions I'd missed. I got a lot more marks that way I must say.
 

Originality

Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2007
Messages
47
Gender
Female
HSC
2007
I think i wouldve given up since it looks really complex, i would have thought it was wrong.
 

Poad

Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2007
Messages
188
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Fish Sauce said:
I should not have made a common denominator in part i, haha crap it would've been so much easier. I have been a fool.
This. Is. SO. True. =\
 

Fish Sauce

Active Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
1,051
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Poad said:
This. Is. SO. True. =\
Someone feels my pain!

Seriously, the numerator I had in my differentiated equation was three lines long. It was ridiculous. I probably could have done it if I hadn't simplified the thing in part 1 :(
 

me121

Premium Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2006
Messages
1,397
Location
-33.917188, 151.232890
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Yea. I got the same.
P = L[1]/x^2+L[2]/(m-x)^2

dP/dx = -2*L[1]/x^3+2*L[2]/(m-x)^3

Then by making this equal to zero,

x = m*L[1]^(1/3)/(L[1]^(1/3)+L[2]^(1/3))

d^2*P/dx^2 = 6*L[1]/x^4+6*L[2]/(m-x)^4

As the denominators are to the power of 4, they are always +, and as L1 and L2 are >0, the second deriv is +, therefore it is a local minimum.
 
Last edited:

Steth0scope

Member
Joined
May 23, 2006
Messages
266
Location
Camperdown
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
it didnt say L1 and L2 > 0 although they may pay it im not too sure... i simplified my fractions to end up with one fraction with everything to the power of 4/3 or to the power of 4 .. which means the fraction has to be positive because the cube root of a qaurtic (x^4/3) is always positive too... i dunno i may be wrong too
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top