i keep hearing that the reason why the coalition is in government is because of their excellent economic credentials when compared to labour. but i can't help but thinking that just as menzies was "riding on the sheep's back" howard is riding on the back of this commodities boom.
is this rate of economic growth a testament to the coalition's economic prowess, or is it just a coincidence that the economies of china and japan started to demand more of our resources? one of the key areas that caused me to question the coalition's economic management skills was productivity. the coalition's answer to raising productivity was work choices, yet they have done little to address the growing skills shortage.
in terms of macroeconomic policy, both are very similar in their approach to fiscal and monetary policy, by the rba's own admission. so, is the coalition's economic superiority over the alp genuine, or is it due to the economic problems labour last had when in government?
is this rate of economic growth a testament to the coalition's economic prowess, or is it just a coincidence that the economies of china and japan started to demand more of our resources? one of the key areas that caused me to question the coalition's economic management skills was productivity. the coalition's answer to raising productivity was work choices, yet they have done little to address the growing skills shortage.
in terms of macroeconomic policy, both are very similar in their approach to fiscal and monetary policy, by the rba's own admission. so, is the coalition's economic superiority over the alp genuine, or is it due to the economic problems labour last had when in government?