Attn All Human Storiers (1 Viewer)

trekkie

Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2003
Messages
159
Location
Newcastle
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
hey guys, found this artilce on ninemsn about a new species thats been discovered, H. floresiensis-believe me its worth a read!:-

In an astonishing discovery that could rewrite the history of human evolution, scientists say they have found the skeleton of a new human species, a dwarf, marooned for eons in a tropical Lost World while modern man rapidly colonised the rest of the planet.

The finding on a remote Indonesian island has stunned anthropologists like no other in recent memory. It is a fundamentally new creature that bears more of a resemblance to fictional, barefooted hobbits than modern humans.

Yet biologically speaking, it may have been closely related to us and perhaps even shared its caves with our ancestors.

The 3-foot-tall adult female skeleton found in a cave is believed 18,000 years old. It smashes the long-cherished scientific belief that our species, Homo sapiens, systematically crowded out other upright-walking human cousins beginning 160,000 years ago and that we've had Earth to ourselves for tens of thousands of years.

Instead, it suggests recent evolution was more complex than previously thought.

And it demonstrates that Africa, the acknowledged cradle of humanity, does not hold all the answers to persistent questions of how - and where - we came to be.

"This finding really does rewrite our knowledge of human evolution," said Chris Stringer, who directs human origins studies at the Natural History Museum in London. "And to have them present less than 20,000 years ago is frankly astonishing."

Scientists called the dwarf skeleton "the most extreme" figure to be included in the extended human family. Certainly, she is the shortest.

She is the best example of a trove of fragmented bones that account for as many as seven of these primitive individuals that lived on the equatorial island of Flores, located east of Java and northwest of Australia. The mostly intact female skeleton was found in September 2003.

Scientists have named the extinct species Homo floresiensis, or Flores Man, and details appear in Thursday's issue of the journal Nature.

The specimens' ages range from 95,000 to 12,000 years old, meaning they lived until the threshold of recorded human history and perhaps crossed paths with the ancestors of today's islanders.

Flores Man was hardly formidable. His grapefruit-sized brain was two-thirds smaller than ours, and closer to the brains of today's chimpanzees and transitional prehuman species in Africa than vanished 2 million years ago.

Yet Flores Man made stone tools, lit fires and organised group hunts for meat. Bones of fish, birds and rodents found near the skeleton were charred, suggesting they were cooked.

All this suggests Flores Man lived communally and communicated effectively, perhaps even verbally.

"It is arguably the most significant discovery concerning our own genus in my lifetime," said anthropologist Bernard Wood of George Washington University, who reviewed the research independently.
 

trekkie

Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2003
Messages
159
Location
Newcastle
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
If the human story stays an option for that long then i think that they'll have no choice, but we can use it now to support/refute out of africa/regional continuity
 

= Jennifer =

Active Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2003
Messages
2,466
Location
sydney's inner west
Gender
Female
HSC
2004
i rang up the advice line because i wasnt quite sure how to make it fit with my regional continuity argument and they said they didnt know :eek: does anyone have any ideas to help me out here :confused: thanks
 

thejosiekiller

every me
Joined
Mar 20, 2004
Messages
2,324
Location
north shore./
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
i would say its very dificult at this moment to tie into any models on human migration - all we know is that fossils were found on an island near indonesia that range from 95000 to 12000 yrs old.

it may bear some resemblane to the idea that aboriginal people migrated from indonesia in the regional continuity model- where they are said to have migrated 60000 to 50000 yrs ago.

also the basis for this model states that difference in homo sapiens occured because of divergent evolution- why didnt these hominids evolve into homo sapiens then? or are they a slow descendant from H erectus?

thats my 2 cents and im kent brockman, and i may be wrong.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top