Australia's effectiveness in dealing with domestic human rights issues. (1 Viewer)

MadisonMary

New Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2009
Messages
1
Gender
Female
HSC
2010
I'm having a little difficulty not only finding information for this question, but also differentiating it from the legal and non-legal measures for addressing human rights abuses.

help please? :]
 

kelllly

Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2009
Messages
89
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
Hi MadisonMary. :) Here's an overview:

Legal measures


FOR


  • Australia is signatory to many international treaties e.g. the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights (which lists 30 human rights).
  • Australia does not have an entrenched Bill of Rights (which is difficult to change and may become inappropriate over time).
  • Rights are available because they haven't been interfered with.
  • The establishment of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (HREOC)
  • Application of the rule of law
AGAINST

HREOC

  • under-resourced
  • recommendations frequently ignored
The rule of law may exist, however

  • due process is denied for alleged supporters of terroism;
  • protection of national borders is more important than providing refuge for asylum seekers; and
  • trade alliances override support for Australian citizens accused of crimes of terror abroad.
Non-legal measures

FOR

  • NGOs (e.g. NSW Council for Civil Liberties)
The 1994 Child Sex Tourism legislation is an example of a change in law that came about because of campaigns by NGOs.

  • Media
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top