Whether or not swords are dangerous is not the issue here.
The debate is on whether the individual should be allowed to posses weaponry with the capability, albeit symbolic capability, to injure another.
First went guns, then fireworks, knives, scalpels...I think it's good that they're finally rounding up swords.
The debate is on whether the individual should be allowed to posses weaponry with the capability, albeit symbolic capability, to injure another.
First went guns, then fireworks, knives, scalpels...I think it's good that they're finally rounding up swords.